Redactions by Town of Hingham under M.G.L. c. 4, ยง 7(26)(c)(o) & (p) and in accordance with Boston Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Department of Criminal Justice Information Services, 484 Mass. 279 (2020).and all other applicable laws. Matthews Matthews, LLC Confidential Investigation Town of Hingham Incident 20-28394 October 21, 2020 Background Information On September 2, 2020, Matthews Matthews, LLC was retained by Mr. Thomas Mayo, Town Administrator, on behalf of the Town of Hingham, Massachusetts. Mr. Mayo asked Matthews Matthews to conduct an administrative investigation concerning an incident that occurred on June 5, 2020 at approximately 1837 hours and was assigned a (CAD) computer aided dispatch incident number 20?28394. Mr. Mayo asked Matthews Matthews to review the actions of the police and town officials relative to the handling of incident report 20-28394. He further asked investigators to review whether any con?dential information or documents which were non-public records were released by any police or town official without proper authorization. Finally, he asked Matthews Matthews to review whether any action or communication regarding this matter may warrant referral to another authority. Matthews Matthews, LLC was provided documents, police logs and recorded communications between Hingham Police officers and personnel from the South Shore Regional Emergency Communications Center (SSRECC) concerning Hingham incident 20-28394 by the Town of Hingham. Investigators also conducted an investigation of Hingham Police phone records that were provided by Mr. Steven Becker, Manager of Information Systems for the Town of Hingham, MA. Investigators learned that Hingham incident 20-28394 was an assigned incident number generated by the SSRECC concerning a radio transmission that was made by Hingham Police officer Christopher LoBianco on June 5, 2020 to Dispatcher Joseph Delvecchio, who is an employee of the SSRECC. Officer LoBianco was assigned to the Hingham Derby Street Shops on a special security detail. Officer LoBianco was in uniform and patrolling the shops in cruiser number 913. Investigators reviewed the recorded radio calls and transmissions that were provided by the Town of Hingham. The following is a timeline of the recorded communications in this investigation that was provided to Matthews Matthews: June 5, 2020 @1837 hours Hingham Police Officer Christopher LoBianco made a radio transmission to SSRECC Dispatcher Joseph Delvecchio June 5, 2020 1838 hours Hingham Police Chief Glenn Olsson calls Extension 1483 at the SSRECC and speaks initially with Dispatcher Alison Graham and then Dispatcher Joseph Delvecchio June 5, 2020 @1840 hours Hingham Police Chief Olsson calls extension 2201 and Speaks with Hingham Police Lieutenant Sean Cavanaugh. June 5, 2020 1842 hours Supervisor Jonathan Gordon of the SSRECC calls Extension 2201 and speaks with Lieutenant Sean Cavanaugh June 5, 2020@ 1843 hours Hingham Police Lieutenant Sean Cavanaugh calls Of?cer Christopher LoBianco?s cell phone The following is a transcript of the radio transmission that was made to Dispatcher Delvecchio at the SSRECC by Of?cer LoBianco on June 5, 2020 1837 hours. CHRISTOPHER LOBIANCO: 913 to control JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: Control CHRISTOPHER LOBIANCO: Can you just make a log entry, Derby Street Shops, Mass reg. Suspicious activity. Registered to a Mary Powers. Operators potentially -- - .Vehicle Is following me around, with a ?Black Lives Matter? sign, seems to have joined up with another group of people. Nothing showing at this time. Just make a log entry JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: Received. You need a unit over there? CHRISTOPHER LOBIANCO: Negative. No contact made with the operator. Just log it. Recorded Telephone conversation between Chief Glenn Olsson (retired) and Dispatchers Alison Graham and Joseph Delvecchio on June 5, 2020 at 1838 hours ALLISON GRAHAM: Public safety this line's recorded 2 GLENN OLSSON: Hey. This is Chief Olsson how are you doing? ALLISON GRAHAM: Good. How are you? GLENN OLSSON: Who is dealing with that call? That called in about Mary Power. ALLISON GRAHAM: the what? I?m sorry. GLENN OLSSON: One of our officersjust called in about Mary Powers ALLISON GRAHAM: uh GLENN OLSSON: at the Derby shops. Who is handling that call? ALLISON GRAHAM: the dispatcher or? GLENN OLSSON: the dispatcher. I need to know quick. Because that could be the selectmen. ALLISON GRAHAM: Joe Delvecchio. GLENN OLSSON: OK can I speak to him? ALLISON GRAHAM: yeah. Hold on. JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: hey Chief. GLENN OLSSON: hey. How are you doing? Can you give me the name on Mary power, Their address and everything? That could be the selectmen he just called In. JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: Standby for me one second, Chief, I?m putting in the info right now. GLENN OLSSON: Yeah well may not want the info in there, if it is the selectmen. JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: OK GLENN OLSSON: I may not want a job. JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: The OLN that he gave me was back to a- Car 914:14 to control (background) JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: . Can you grab him Allison? ALLISON GRAHAM: yeah. JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: out of? GLENN OLSSON: yeah. That?s the selectman is it a black Volvo or something, a black JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: and the yeah GLENN OLSSON: SUV JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: the vehicle GLENN OLSSON: Buffalo plates? JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: 2005 Chevy Tahoe yeah to a GLENN OLSSON: yeah. With a buffalo plate, right, Or something like that? JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: No. He gave me a Mass. plate. GLENN OLSSON: OK. JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: And it?s a Mary Power. GLENN OLSSON: can you not put that in there? I got a who is the cruiser? JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: OK. It?s 13. And he?s not actually on my board. GLENN OLSSON: OK. JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: Oh it's Lobi Officer LoBianco. GLENN OLSSON: Yeah. OK. It is probably Yeah JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: So, do you want me because haven?t logged it in yet but I?ve got all the information in the call. Do you want me to just delete everything out of it? GLENN OLSSON: just don?t do anything, till I get right back to you. Let And don?t want lfthere?s some JOSEPH DELVECCHIO: OK GLENN OLSSON: but I want JOSEPH OK. Fair enough Chief. GLENN OLSSON: Ok Recorded telephone conversation between Hingham Police Chief Glenn Olsson and Hingham Police Lieutenant Sean Cavanaugh at 1840 hours SEAN CAVANAUGH: Hey, Chief. GLENN OLSSON: Hey, did you who?s in 913 He isn?t on the board and he just called in the selectman Derby Shops it?s a suspicious car following him with a Black Lives Matter sign. SEAN CAVANAUGH: you sure it was her? GLENN OLSSON: it comes back to her, uh, the address up there where she lives. SEAN CAVANAUGH: Okay. GLENN OLSSON: Hingham address. SEAN CAVANAUGH: So, I I -- I wasn?t sure whether or not it was just a coincidence that was the name of the operator. GLENN OLSSON no it was the black Blazer she was driving for years with the buffalo plate on it. SEAN CAVANAUGH: W--, uh, do you think she was actually, tailing him? GLENN OLSSON: Uh, apparently, she might have given it to But like who knows. But I mean he shouldn?t be saying it?s suspicious and it has Black Lives Matter signs in it. SEAN CAVANAUGH: yeah GLEN OLSSON: What?s he, fucking nuts? SEAN CAVANAUGH: Yeah, Well, I mean if the, you know, I can understand if they?re intentionally tailing him though. You know what I mean? Like, uh, you know. GLENN OLSSON: He doesn?t recognize the name Mary Power? SEAN CAVANAUGH: It's -- honestly do you think he does? GLENN OLSSON: He better. (laughs) You know. If he wants a job. (laughs) (inaudible) SEAN CAVANAUGH: I?ll give him a call though. GLENN OLSSON: Have him call, yeah, because I don?t want this all logged in that we?re putting her in as a suspicious car if this is SEAN CAVANAUGH: Yeah. GLENN OLSSON: Ijust called the dispatch and it came back I ?gured where?s she live_ up there or something. SEAN CAVANAUGH: Yeah (inaudible). GLENN OLSSON: Yeah, m, right? SEAN CAVANAUGH: Uh, yeah, I think it (inaudible) on the corner there. GLENN OLSSON yeah, that' (inaudible) came back to _that? where she . .. - .- .I told him don?t start putting everything in the log yet because SEAN CAVANAUGH: Right, right. I got you. GLENN OLSSON Jesus. SEAN CAVANAUGH All right (inaudible). GLENN OLSSON:(inaudible) have him call me if you want. SEAN CAVANAUGH: No, no I?ll call him Recorded telephone conversation between SSRECC Administrative supervisor Jonathan Gordon and Hingham Police Lieutenant Sean Cavanaugh 1842 hours SEAN CAVANAUGH Hingham Police. This line is recorded. JOHN GORDON: Yes, it is. What?s goin? on, dude? SEAN CAVANAUGH: What?s up? JOHN GORDON: So you have talked to 901 recently? SEAN CAVANAUGH: Nine-one-one? JOHN GORDON: Nine?zero-one. SEAN CAVANAUGH: Nine-zer--one. JON GORDON: Yeah, the five-star general there. CAVANAUGH: Yes, i have. Uh, ljust got off the phone with him. GORDON: Oh. Okay. Good. 80 we have a call on the system for that. We?re not gonna do anything with it. ljust wanted you to know it was there. And I guess he may want it deleted. Uh, so lju--l don?t know what?s goin? on. Hejust talked to one of the dispatchers and told him the same thing he probably just told you or a little less. CAVANAUGH: He certainly can tell you to do that. I am not telling you to do that at all. GORDON: CAVANAUGH: It?s not my thing. GORDON: So I just wanted you to be aware that the call is in the system and that we?re not acting on it, so that you?re not like, ?How come we?re not dealing with this?? SEAN CAVANAUGH: I gotcha, m? JOHN GORDON: Yeah. Okay. All right. Recorded telephone conversation between Hingham Police Lieutenant Sean Cavanaugh and Hingham Police officer Christopher LoBianco at 1843 hours. CHRISTOPHER LOBIANCO: Hello SEAN CAVANAUGHC Lo! CHRISTOPHER LOBIANCO: Hey, what?s going on, SEAN CAVANAUGH: What?s going on? Uh, I?m curious with the incident ot_ following you. Was it- I take it? CHRISTOPHER LOBIANCO: Yeah, I think it?s I think it's, uh, Power?s -. She just everywhere I go he?d just come park next to me and hold up the big, uh, Black Lives Matter sign with the fist and then he points at me and just keeps waving (inaudible) and then he met up with some other vehicles so just just logging it so you guys would be aware. SEAN CAVANAUGH: Yeah, I mean, uh, I thought it was unusual myself, I wanted to check in with you before I, uh, you know, uh, it?s it?s fine. Just leaving it in the log. Uh, have no -- have no trouble with that. Uh, I mean, uh, the chief called me and, you know, he was curious, uh, you know once he heard her name obviously, you know, so but CHRISTOPHER LOBIANCO: Yeah. SEAN CAVANAUGH: But the_ is intentionally following you around. And, you know it is what it is. CHRISTOPHER LOBIANCO: Yeah, I mean he he?s broken off at this. So (inaudible) was trying to figure out who it was so I pulled out my have like a, uh, like binoculars so - SEAN CAVANAUGH: Yeah. CHRISTOPHER LOBIANCO: I think it was-?and, uh, when he when he saw me like looking at him with the binoculars, he like took off and went over by, uh, he?s still over by Chipotle. So SEAN CAVANAUGH: Yeah (inaudible). CHRISTOPHER LOBIANCO: But (inaudible) just keeping an out. Not an issue as of yet. But I just wanted it logged so you guys were aware. SEAN CAVANAUGH: Got it, no problem, man. CHRISTOPHER LOBIANCO: All right. SEAN CAVANAUGH: All right. No worries. CHRISTOPHER LOBIANCO: See ya In furtherance of this investigation Matthews Matthews, LLC conducted interviews of the following individuals: Of?cer Christopher LoBianco -Hingham Police Department Lieutenant Sean Cavanaugh - Hingham Police Department Acting Chief David Jones - Hingham Police Department Chief Glenn Olsson (Retired) Hingham Police Department Dispatcher Joseph Delvecchio South Shore Regional Emergency Communications Center (SSRECC) Administrative Supervisor Jonathan Gordon - South Shore Regional Emergency Communications Center (SSRECC) Executive Director Laurie Croke - South Shore Regional Emergency Communications Center Assistant Executive Director Aaron Smith - South Shore Regional Emergency Communications Center Selectmen Mary Power Selectmen Chair, Town of Hingham, Massachusetts Massachusetts Summary of Interviews Officer Christopher LoBianco September 25, 2020 On September 25, 2020 at approximately 8:45 AM, investigators from Matthews Matthews, LLC interviewed Officer Christopher LoBianco of the Hingham Police Department. The interview took place in the East hearing room at Hingham Town Hall in Hingham, Massachusetts. The interview was recorded with the permission of Officer LoBianco. Officer LoBianco was not accompanied by anyone. Officer LoBianco has been a member of the Hingham Police Department for the past three years. He is currently assigned to the patrol and traffic division and usually works the midnight shift. Of?cer LoBianco stated that he was working on June 5, 2020 on a special detail assignment at the Derby Street shopping plaza from 4 PM to midnight. He said it was supposed to be two officers assigned, however, they could only fill one of the positions. Officer LoBianco stated that he was in his duty uniform and operating a marked Hingham Police cruiser number 913. He said that he was alone in the cruiser. Officer LoBianco explained that his assignment for this special detail at the Derby Street Shops originated because ?the State Police in conjunction with the Braintree Police Department had received some intelligence that they believed that there were a number of shopping plazas that were due to be possibly vandalized in light of the riots that were going on at the time." He further said ?the Apple Store in the area had boarded up its windows and stuff like that and the shops made a collective agreement to hire two police details for a number of nights until possibly the situation quieted down.? 3) He said that during this assignment he used the call sign Cruiser 913 when he communicated with the South Shore Regional Emergency Communications Center (SSRECC) which is located on the top floor in the Hingham Police building. Investigators played a recorded police communication between Cruiser 913 and the SSRECC that occurred on June 5, 2020 at approximately 1837 hours. The call number is 20?28394 which was generated by the SSRECC CAD system. Of?cer LoBianco acknowledged this recording was his voice communicating from Cruiser 913 and the other voice was the dispatcher taking his transmission. He was told the dispatcher?s name was Joseph Delvecchio. He said he was familiar with his name but he does not know him well. Of?cer LoBianco explained the reason for his communication with the dispatch center. He said that he was patrolling the Derby Street Shops parking lot as part of his responsibilities for that evening. He said he made numerous circle patrols of the parking lot area. He said that the area was "sparse?. 8) He said he drove ?extremely slowly? down the side past Kohl's department store and then turned around and stopped in front of the Barnes Noble bookstore and positioned his cruiser facing out to the front entrance. He said it was then that noticed there was another car driving tracing my path, kind that was following me previously when was coming down that area and once I parked it had pulled up to the side of my vehicle like 20 to 30 feet away roughly.? 8) He said that once he parked his cruiser, the operator of a Chevrolet Tahoe whom Officer LoBianco described as a white male, wearing a T-shirt and hat pulled into a parking space so that his windshield would be facing the driver?s side of Officer LoBianco's cruiser. Officer LoBianco estimated their distance to be ?20 to 30 feet? from each other. 8) He said ?the driver of the vehicle just waved at him several times and pointed at me. just raised my hand and waved back.? Officer LoBianco said that, "once he realized I acknowledged his presence he took a large cardboard sign that had paper on the front of it, a print out, I?m not sure if it was hand drawn or not but was a large sign that said the words Black Lives Matter and at the end had a clenched fist the one that originated with like the communist era.? 9) 10 He said the operator of the vehicle then took the sign and pressed it against the windshield flush and pointed at him several times. Officer LoBianco stated he then retrieved a pair of binoculars in order to better see the vehicle registration and tried to see the face of the operator. He said that he then was able to observe the assigned license plate to the vehicle and he performed a check with CJIS on the data terminal in his cruiser to determine the identity of the operator and owner of the vehicle. He said that this check revealed that the vehicle is registered to Mary Power whom Officer LoBianco identified as a town selectman. He said he only learned her identity and that she was the owner of the vehicle from the picture and address and information that was provided to him by the CJIS criminal justice information system when he queried the registration from his cruiser?s mobile data terminal. He said it was apparent that the operator, whom he described as a 10) was not Mary Power. Officer LoBianco stated he next conducted a check with CJ IS to determine_ that the vehicle was registered to in Hingham. He then determined from the information that it was possibly 3? operating the vehicle at that time. He said that the operator appeared to fit the description that was provided by CJIS. He said that he did not have any contact with the operator of the vehicle. He said that ?once he realized I was looking at him with binoculars, he took the sign down and drove down the path that he originally followed me in front of Kohl?s and parked with a group of vehicles that was over at Chipotle in that area?. (p.11) He said the entire time that they were looking at each other was definitely under five minutes. He said that he asked the dispatcherjust to note the activity for the log. He said a log entry is something you do when the activity does not require a written report. Of?cer LoBianco said that he did not stop the vehicle and had no verbal interaction with the operator of the vehicle. He stated he had no other interaction with that vehicle or the operator for the remainder of the assigned shift on June 5, 2020. Of?cer LoBianco was asked if he had any other conversation with anyone regarding this call. He said that he had recalled a communication with Lieutenant Cavanaugh, the Of?cer in charge of the shift. Officer LoBianco was then provided a copy of Hingham Police recorded telephone conversation on June 5, 2020 at 6:43 PM. Of?cer LoBianco stated he recalled the conversation and he believed that Hingham Police Lieutenant Sean Cavanaugh called his (Officer LoBianco?s) personal cell phone. 11 Officer LoBianco was asked what he believed was the purpose of the call from Lieutenant Cavanaugh. He stated ?he just wanted clarification based on the tone of his voice sounds like he was checking on me just to make sure i was 17) Of?cer LoBianco later noted that because of the coronavirus many of the shops were closed and it was pretty desolate down at the Derby Street Shops. He said because there was not a lot of activity his attention was drawn clearly to this vehicle. Of?cer LoBianco said there was no other activity that he recalled that he had to deal with that evening. He said the majority of stores with the exception of the food stores, were closed and the Apple Store remained boarded up with plywood and closed. Of?ce LoBianco was asked if anyone else called him from Hingham or spoke with him regarding this call on June 5, 2020. He stated 20) Of?cer LoBianco was asked if Chief Olsson contacted him regarding this incident. He stated, ?He did not.? He said he did not meet with anyone else concerning this incident. (9- 21) Of?cer LoBianco stated he never wrote any report or follow up concerning the incident on June 5, 2020 at 1838 hours. Of?cer LoBianco was asked if he provided any information outside of the department or spoke with anyone outside the department concerning this call. He said Officer LoBianco stated he was familiar with the records that are generated for the log from the SSRECC as well as the Hingham Police logs. Of?cer LoBianco stated he did not look at the unredacted log entry from the SSRECC. He said he had attempted to look for it prior to his interview with investigators; however, he could not locate it in the system. Of?ce LoBianco was then shown both the log entry generated from the SSRECC and the other Hingham Police public log entry. Of?cer LoBianco was asked upon reviewing the document from the SSRECC if any of the information that he provided in the radio call was not in the narrative. He said ?yes it does not list out that the vehicle had followed me over to my location. ltjust states that a party is waving a sign which is inaccurate of what occurred.? 26) He further stated they also did not indicate the content that was on the sign. Of?cer LoBianco was asked if he had any information concerning the modi?cation of the log document. He said ?no, I don?t know exactly what they would modify it would just appear that that this narrative that is here does not appear to contain all the information I gave them on the radio.? 27) 12 Of?cer LoBianco was asked ifanyone from the general public has asked him for information concerning this incident. He said 27) Lieutenant Sean Cavanauqh September 25 2020 On September 25, 2020 at approximately 11:41 AM, investigators from Matthews Matthews, LLC conducted an interview of Lieutenant Sean Cavanaugh of the Hingham Police Department. Mr. Cavanaugh was told the purpose of the interview was related to an investigation of police incident number 2028394 and any involvement or knowledge he had concerning this incident. The interview was recorded with the permission of Lieutenant Cavanaugh and he was not accompanied by anyone. Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated he has been a member of the Hingham Police Department for eighteen years and has been a Lieutenant for the past six or seven years. He stated he is currently in charge of the 4:00 PM to midnight shift. Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated his duties include assigning officers to the shift, reporting any relevant information the officers need, booking and watching prisoners, and various other duties. Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated to the best of his recollection he was working on June 5, 2020. Investigators played a recording on June 5, 2020 consisting of a radio transmission by Officer LoBianco making a report to a dispatcher. Upon hearing the call, Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated he recalled this report coming in and said he believes Of?cer LoBianco was on a special assignment at the Derby Street Shops. 3) Investigators played another recording on June 5, 2020 at 6:40 PM. Upon review, Lieutenant Cavanaugh confirmed this was a telephone conversation between him and Chief Olsson. Investigators also played a recording on June 5, 2020 at 6:42 PM. Upon review Lieutenant Cavanaugh confirmed this was a telephone conversation between him and John Gordon, who is a dispatch supervisor. When asked, Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated the Chief made a reference at the end of his call with him about deleting the call from Officer LoBianco. When asked, Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated he did not know if you can delete a call. (p.14) Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated he has permission to log into the system at the SSRECC, but he does not think he has the ability to modify a call. Investigators played another recording on June 5, 2020 at 6:43 PM. Upon review, Lieutenant Cavanaugh con?rmed this was a call between him and Of?cer Chris LoBianco. He stated he called Officer LoBianco because the Chief had requested him to call and inquire about the incident. He stated, "someone?s following you around as a police officer. You?re, as a police of?cer, you?re, you know, you?re trained to to look for that sort of thing and someone?s, you know, aside from the fact that it's, you know, 13 whether or not it?s a harassment type issue it?s a safety issue because someone?s intentionally following you. So you have to be uh, you know, at least on your guard that that this is going on? (p.19) Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated from what he recalls Of?cer LoBianco ?was a special assignment because the Derby Street Shops were sort of a potential hot spot for activity? so they had a couple of extra cruisers assigned to that location. (p.19) Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated he believes Officer LoBianco wanted the event documented in case something else happened later that was odd, and they could look back at the incident. When asked, Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated there was no doubt in his mind that Officer LoBianco was performing his duties as a police officer. Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated after speaking with Officer LoBianco he physically went to see the Chief at the Chiefs office. He stated after telling the Chief the gist of his conversation with Officer LoBianco, the Chief seemed to be somewhat upset about it. Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated he told the Chief he did not think the incident was a ?monstrous incident? 21) but it was noteworthy to Of?cer LoBianco, but not something he wanted to take immediate action on. When asked, Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated the Chief was clearly upset because the Selectwoman?s name is ?out there? and Of?cer LoBianco should be aware of who she is and what she is driving and things of that nature. When asked, Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated he did not go over to the SSRECC after his meeting with the Chief and could not recall if he had another conversation with Mr. Gordon concerning this incident. When asked if the Chief told him he had gone to the SSRECC the night of this incident, Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated, ?absolutely not?. 23) When asked, Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated the Chief never said he wanted to do anything to the log entry of this incident. He stated he knew nothing about any official log record being changed. 24) Investigators showed Lieutenant Cavanaugh two log entries, one being the of?cial log entry from the SSRECC and the other being what the town website published regarding this incident. Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated the more detailed document is what you see from the official police log. Upon review, Lieutenant Cavanaugh was directed to look at the last three lines where it denotes the name of Delvecchio who is the dispatcher and then it denotes narrative at 18:38, followed by an entry at 19:03 where it was modified. When asked, Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated he does not know anything about this document being modified. 27) He stated the only person outside the department he spoke with about this incident was his wife. He stated he has not provided any information on this call to the public. When asked, Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated he has not provided any information from the of?cial log entry to the public regarding this incident. 31) When asked, Lieutenant Cavanaugh stated he believes he did not have any follow up conversations concerning incident 20-28394 with the Chief after the original date of the incident. 14 Interim Police Chief David Jones - October 6, 2020 On October 6, 2020, at approximately 12:20 PM, investigators from Matthews Matthews, LLC conducted an interview of Hingham Interim Police Chief David Jones. Chief Jones was interviewed at the Hingham Town Hall East Hearing room. The interview was conducted in furtherance of the Town of Hingham investigation regarding incident 20-28394 at the Derby Street Shopping Plaza in Hingham, MA. The interview of Chief Jones was audio recorded with his permission and he was not accompanied by anyone. Chief Jones stated that he was hired by the Town of Hingham as a police officer in 2000. He was appointed as a Deputy Chief in 2015 and appointed as the Interim Chief on August 4, 2020. Chief Jones was asked if he is aware of a police radio call and a log entry on June 5, 2020 that are the subject of the investigation at hand. He stated he is familiar. He added that he was not working the evening shift when the incident occurred but has since reviewed the material. He said that he is aware that Officer Christopher LoBianco of the Hingham Police Department made a radio transmission regarding a subject that was observed in a motor vehicle at the Derby Street Shops with a Black Lives Matter sign. Chief Jones was asked if he knows why Officer LoBianco was working in the area of the Derby Street Shops on that evening. He stated that there had been concerns about protestors and security in the area, so a paid detail shift was hired to provide added security. Chief Jones stated that he first became aware of the incident when he spoke with then Chief of Police, Glenn Olsson over the telephone at approximately 7:00 or 8:00 PM on June 5, 2020. Chief Jones said that Chief Olsson explained to him that he was concerned about the radio transmission Officer LoBianco made and the use of the term ?Black Lives Matter and sort of framing it as suspicious.? 4) Chief Jones stated that he and Chief Olsson discussed the fact that the person with the sign in the vehicle was of Hingham Selectman, Mary Power. Chief Jones said that Chief Olsson was also concerned about what information would be entered into the police logs. Chief Jones said that he is unaware if Chief Olsson had spoken to anyone else about his concerns that evening. Chief Jones was asked if he is familiar with the CAD system, and specifically if he knew whether or not Chief Olsson could enter a particular log entry and change the narrative. Chief Jones said that he believed that Chief Olsson would have had the authority and ability to do so, but is unaware if Chief Olsson would know how to do that. 15 Chief Jones was asked if he had any conversations with anyone else on the evening of June 5, 2020 following his conversation with Chief Olsson. He stated no. Chief Jones was shown the log records concerning the June 5, 2020 call and the narrative that was entered into the CAD system. He stated, ?80, uh, it?s basically saying that the narrative was entered on, uh, June 5th, at, uh, 18:38, by Joseph Delvecchio, and then it was modified on the same date, at 19:03, by that same party, Joseph Delvecchio." 8) Chief Jones stated that he is familiar with Joseph Delvecchio and knows he is employed as a dispatcher at the SSRECC. Chief Jones stated that he has not had any conversations with anyone regarding this incident, except for the Town Administrator and the Town Attorneys. He has not conducted any further investigation or analysis of any records outside of retrieving certain documents at the Town?s request. Chief Jones stated that he is familiar with the operational aspects of the CAD system and understands that any changes made to a log entry after the original data is entered would reflect a modi?cation record to that item in the system. Chief Jones was asked who has access to enter into the incident log system to review the data. He stated ?anybody in dispatch and anybody in the eight agencies that work with SSRECC. 80 police and fire for Hingham, Hull, Cohasset, Norvvell uh, the staff can go look at those entries.? 20) Chief Jones said this is a common practice for officers to do prior to their shift to gather information about previous calls and activity in the town. Chief Jones said that the ability to actually modify a prior entry is controlled by access authority. He said, ?To Modify it, uh, only, uh, the dispatcher, their supervisors. Uh, our police supervisors have access to modify it, and above. So, uh, you know, sergeants and above can modify a log entry, uh, on the police side. i don?t know about the fire side.? 22) He added that instances where a police department member would modify an entry would almost never happen. He said that if an of?cer noticed that information had been left out of an entry, or that something was mis-spelled, they would ask a dispatcher to correct the entry for them. Chief Jones was asked about the ?public log? that is generated by the department for public viewing. He stated that this log is created by the Records Division and it contains only basic information on an incident. He said that prior to an entry being posted on the public log, all personal information (addresses, dates of birth, etc.) is removed prior to posting to the Department's website. Matthews Matthews? investigators asked Chief Jones if he was aware that Selectman Mary Power obtained a copy of the internal police report log regarding this matter. He stated no. He was asked if a release of the internal log version (non-public) was provided to someone outside the department, and if that would be a violation of Department policy. Chief Jones stated. mean, the, uh, private, CAD side of the logrelease a full, un-redacted report in so?- uh, to people, if, uh -- if 16 they?re an involved party, like a victim of a crime, etc. They can get an un?redacted copy. Uh, the log entry, uh, you know, unless it has some other information on other than the requesting party, I -- I don't see why it would be a violation.? 26) Chief Jones was asked if someone could request an unredacted copy of the internal log if their own name was part of an entry. He said that the Department would provide the internal log, but most likely redact the names or personal information of other parties involved. Chief Jones was asked if? would be provided with the internal log regarding this matter if he were to come to the Hingham Police Department and request to see it. He said, ?if he?s an involved party, uh, he would be. There would also be -- we keep records of anyone who requests public information. So, there?d be an entry made that that person came in and requested, uh we?d either given it or denied that information.? (9- 28) Chief Jones was asked if he was aware if anyone came to the Department and requested the logs regarding the June 5, 2020 incident. He said, ?Uh, I?m the records access of?cer for the department, although I don?t approve every records request. I do review the log. And have not seen or noticed anything that says that they came in to request it. Uh, so not to my knowledge, no.? 29) Chief Glenn Olsson (Retired) October 6, 2020 On October 6, 2020, investigators from Matthews Matthews, LLC conducted an interview of Chief Glenn Olsson (Retired) of the Hingham, MA Police Department. The interview occurred at the Hingham Town Hall in the East hearing room. The interview was recorded with the permission of Chief Olsson. Chief Olsson was not accompanied by anyone during this interview. The purpose of the interview was to determine what information and involvement Chief Olsson had concerning Hingham Police incident number 20-28394. Chief Olsson has been a member of the Hingham Police Department for the past 40 years. He rose through the ranks and became Chief in 2015. He retired as the Chief of the Department in the summer of 2020. Investigators began by playing a copy of the recording of the radio transmission that was provided by the town of Hingham that generated Hingham Police incident 20-28394 for Chief Olsson. Chief Olsson stated he was working late in his office at the Hingham Police Department on Friday, June 5, 2020 when he first heard this call live on his portable radio in his of?ce. He said he originally only "caught the tail end of the call sort of wasn?t exactly sure what was going on.? 5) 17 The Chief?s office is located on the second floor of the Hingham Police Department Building. He stated that the SSRECC is also located on the same floor as his office in the Hingham Police building. Chief Olsson said he did not know at the time who the officer was in Cruiser 913 and he also did not know which dispatcher at the SSRECC was handling the call. He said he did recognize some of the information. recognized the name as Mary Power and I think they gave the address. Mary Power works with the Town of Hingham; she?s a public figure. She?s one of the Selectmen.? 6) Chief Olsson said that he has a working relationship with Selectman Power but he does not socialize with her. Chief Olsson stated that Mary Power is a two term Selectman, has served as the Chair and that the Police Department reports to the Board of Selectmen. Chief Olsson was asked what he did after he ?rst heard this information on the radio. He said wanted to know a little bit more about the call because I really wasn?t sure and I know on my computer 913 wasn?t listed as being one of the cruisers out.? 8) He further stated, called over to dispatch to find out what was going on." 9) Investigators then played a recorded telephone call between Chief Olsson and SSRECC dispatcher Joseph Delvecchio at 18:38 hours on June 5, 2020. Chief Olsson identi?ed the call and said ?We have a number like it?s- or- that goes over to so I think I called either one of those to get that?s generally supposed to be the supervisor.? 11) Chief Olsson was asked what he meant when he said to Dispatcher Delvecchio, ?may not want the info in there and not want a job.? Chief Olsson said think I said I might not want a job.? 12) Chief Olsson was asked what he meant when he told Dispatcher Delvecchio not to do anything regarding deleting information. He said ?Well, I didn?t really want to get into changing the log. And I didn?t really know why the officer had him stopped. And obviously ifl had a log deleted, then the Officer would be left hanging and I wasn?t gonna do that to the officer. 15) He was then asked what he meant by leaving the officer hanging. He said, mean I didn?t want to take if he had probable cause to stop the vehicle and I had the log deleted, if someone came in and filed a complaint or something or something else came of it, you wouldn?t be able to find it in the log. You know that?s why we try not to alter logs." 15) 18 The Chief was asked if a log could be deleted if it?s already created a CAD number. The Chief stated don?t know how to do anything like that. No, I don?t think you can, I don?t, it would show if you did to the best of my knowledge.? 16) Chief Olsson stated that he learned that the Officer making the radio transmission was Officer LoBianco but he did not know which Officer LoBianco it was. He said there are two LoBiancos on the department and they are brothers. He said both of the brothers are ?very proactive, and really helped out when we needed them, they stepped up to the plate. They do the extra work you know and community policing stuff very good officers.? 15) Chief Olsson was asked now that he knew it was Officer LoBianco what was his main concern. He said ?it was a detail at the Hingham Derby shops and they had because of what was happening in Boston during some of the protests, they were concerned about damage up there. There were some reports of people people from possibly an Antifa like group or other groups, might be parking in the remote area remote malls, so when they left Boston on their way home, they would damage the area they were parked in sort of to bring their cause further out so it got recognition. I believe the night before Braintree had a lot of issues for the people parking in Braintree on the way home from Boston." 19) Chief Olsson said he believes that the Derby Street Shops wanted officers around the clock because of their concern. He said that the responsibility of the of?cers filling the Derby Street Shops detail was to ?keep an on things, make sure that no vandalism was occurring and also note that if people were parking there, and you know a van pulled in ,10 cars pulled in, and 10 people jumped into the van with signs and stuff, we would know that, that would be cars we would have to be on the lookout for later to make sure that they didn?t come back and vandalize the Derby shops.? (pp. 19-20) Chief Olsson said that he originally thought that Of?cer LoBianco had stopped a car because he only heard some of the transmission. Chief Olsson stated he next called Hingham Police Lieutenant Cavanaugh. Investigators then played a recorded call between Chief Olsson and Lieutenant Cavanaugh on June 5, 2020 at approximately 6:40 PM. Chief Olsson said that he called downstairs from his desk to Lieutenant Cavanaugh in this call. Chief Olsson was asked the purpose of his call to Lieutenant Cavanaugh. He said wanted to find out what was going on and I think you know we have supervisors and you know to generally oversee some of these things so I just wanted to make sure that the call was handled correctly and properly and I mentioned being familiar with the Powers you I know who she is. I couldn?t imagine her doing something like that. 19 And her family?s you know they were_ and stuff so just seems sort of weird, wasn?t adding up to me I didn?t know what was going on.? 28) The Chief later said concerning Officer LoBianco that ?it didn?t make sense that he wouldn?t have recognized the name of who it was.? 29) He also stated that he was going to let Lieutenant Cavanagh handle speaking with Of?cer LoBianco. Chief Olsson said he also walked over to the SSRECC which is located across from his office. He said he met with Dispatcher Delvecchio in his console in the SSRECC. Chief Olsson was asked if he recalled the conversation he had with Dispatcher Delvecchio and he said just asked said I explained what it was that I really didn?t you know we talked a little bit and ljust said that I think he might have asked me again or maybe it was on the phone about deleting it and I said no because it?s the of?cer?s probable cause. 80, don?t delete it, my main concern was the issue of the whole story with the Black Lives Matter sign because I didn?t want her thinking that we were pursuing after people just because they had a Black Lives Matter sign that wasn?t really the incident here.? (pp. 35-36) Chief Olsson was then shown the of?cial log that was provided to investigators from the Town of Hingham for incident 20 -28394.The document contains information concerning Mary Power and It has their addresses and dates of birth and social security numbers. Chief Olsson identi?ed the log. He was asked if he had any of that personal information taken out of the log. He replied 37) Chief Olsson then was asked about the change that is noted in the narrative modified at 1903 by Dispatcher Delvecchio. He was asked if he had anything else taken out of the log other than a Black Lives Matter sign. He said ?just the Black Lives Matter sign that I?m aware of.? 38) Chief Olsson believes he did not stay much later that night on June 5, 2020. He said he might?ve said goodbye to Lieutenant Cavanaugh on the way out and he then recalled that he thought that Lieutenant Cavanaugh asked the Chief if he was going to call Mary Power. He stated said no there?s no need for me to because really you know and told 'em what he did because he didn't do anything.? (p.40) Chief Olsson was asked if anyone ever asked him to intervene on this matter that occurred on June 5, 2020 at approximately 1837 hours. He said no and that he never 20 intervened and no one else intervened concerning this matter. He said, ?Absolutely not. the officer was doing what he was supposed to do." 42) Chief Olsson said he did not do anything further or hear anything more on this incident at the Derby Street Shops until approximately a month and a half later, sometime later in July of 2020. He said the Police Department received a public records request from a citizen requesting public records concerning phone calls, tapes or materials related to the incident 20?28394 on June 5, 2020. The Chief was asked what he did with this request for information. He said ?i think I informed the Town Manager about it because that?s the procedure we use for freedom of information.? 45) Chief Olsson stated he met with the Town Manager and ?explained to him the you know what the case was and my role in it so that he was aware of what was transitioning.? 46) Chief Olsson said he also at some point (later in July) had a meeting with Selectman Mary Power concerning this incident. He said he believes she reached out to him and left a message and he called her back. He believes that she had also been notified of the FOIAs concerning this incident and had questions about it. Chief Olsson said that he prepared some notes prior to meeting with Selectman Power because he wanted to recall it and also believed at some point, he was going to have to write a report about the incident and his involvement. (His notes are included in this report). Investigators reviewed Chief Olsson?s hand written notes which he prepared sometime in late July, 2020. He was asked about the note in paragraph 3, which states a motor vehicle stop had happened. "There was a lot of radio talk which drew my attention. I recall thinking that it was not his mission. I was concerned of him performing traffic stops, not watch for parker/ protestors that would be arriving at this time. I also heard it was Mary Power's. and I am aware that?never been in trouble. They did not fit the profile of who we were looking for. The notes also state I contacted shift supervisor Cavanaugh. I may have tried to reach Officer LoBianco or another of?cer on duty." Chief Olsson was asked in reference to his notes if he ever spoke with Officer LoBianco about this incident. He stated, never spoke to LoBianco because I didn?t have his phone number.? 52) 21 Chief Olsson stated that he gave Mary Power the notes he had written which he had prepared for himself. Chief Olsson was asked ?if at any time Mary Power asked him to change this or make it go away, get rid of this log. I don?t want this.? He said, "oh no, no.? 54) He said that a request to change it or make the incident go away never came up in the meeting with Mary Power. He explained to her what occurred and why someone might be looking for a public records request on this incident. He said in his opinion it was apparent that- hadn?t even mentioned the incident to her. Chief Olsson said he never provided anyone else besides Town Manager Tom Mayo or Selectman Mary Power any information regarding incident 20-28394. Chief Olsson said that he never provided any information to anyone in the public regarding this incident. Chief Olsson was asked if he recalled if he went to the Dispatch Supervisor Gordon concerning doing anything about this call. He said 58) He said he never asked Dispatcher Delvecchio to go to his supervisor about this incident either. Chief Olsson was asked if he felt that requesting the dispatcher to remove the notation about the Black Lives Matter sign was appropriate. He stated "yes I do it really had nothing to do with what was going on. And I think that you know displaying the sign would just know allow someone to latch onto something, to create an issue about you know. I think the officer had probable cause to make a note of what happened here. He was doing what we asked him to do. Whether the person had the sign or not really didn't matter. Because you know we were looking for people that were going to be parking. Displaying the sign probably gave him credence to believe that this is what he was looking for. But I don't think it was really crucial to have in the log. And I thought it would just act as an antagative, you know would just allow false reason for why it was stopped, unless you went into some long history of the whole thing.? 61) Joseph Delvecchio September 25, 2020 On September 25, 2020 at approximately 10:55 AM, investigators from Matthews Matthews, LLC conducted an interview of Mr. Joseph Delvecchio. The interview took place in the East hearing room in the Town of Hingham Town Hall. The interview was recorded with the permission of Dispatcher Delvecchio. Dispatcher Delvecchio was not accompanied by anyone for the interview. Dispatcher Delvecchio has been employed by the South Shore Regional Emergency Communications Center (SSRECC) for the past three years. The SSRECC is located 22 on the second floor of the Hingham Police building. Dispatcher Delvecchio said his current supervisor is Chip Gordon. Dispatcher Delvecchio explained that as part of his duties as dispatcher he answers radio calls and other calls for police departments including the Hingham Police Department. Investigators played for Dispatcher Delvecchio a recorded radio transmission that was received from the Town of Hingham. The radio transmission was generated from Hingham cruiser 913 to the SSRECC on June 5, 2020 at approximately 1837 hours. Dispatcher Delvecchio identi?ed the officer in Cruiser 913 as Officer LoBianco of the Hingham Police Department. Dispatcher Delvecchio did not know at the time what Officer LoBianco's assignment was but that he later learned he was on a special detail at the Derby Street Shops. He also said at the time he was not sure which LoBianco he was dealing with because there are two brothers currently on the Hingham Police Department. Dispatcher Delvecchio stated that when officers make radio calls to the SSRECC, that Dispatcher Delvecchio as a Dispatcher usually then generates a new call on the CAD computer system. He stated he does this by hitting the F11 buttons on the computer. Dispatcher Delvecchio said that on this call #20-28394 he entered the call as suspicious activity as he was directed to do by Officer LoBianco. Dispatcher Delvecchio stated that he enters the information that he is receiving from the officer into the computer as he is getting it. He further stated ?at this point i had hand written the Sierra (S) number that he had given me and the plate number that he had given me. And was going to enter those in to get a listing for him." 6) He said that he usually writes things down on paper first because he does not want to miss any of the information that?s given. He said then "I?m just going to say I received it then l?m going to F11. I?m going to put the information in that I need to put in.? 8) Dispatcher Delvecchio was asked if he had the handwritten notes from that incident on June 5, 2020. He said he did not have them anymore. Dispatcher Delvecchio was asked his understanding of the radio call from Officer LoBianco. He said that he asked Officer LoBianco if he needed another unit over there and Officer LoBianco responded, ?Negative no contact made with the operatorjust log it.? Dispatcher Delvecchio said, ?He said he did not have contact which ljust again I believe like the day before or the days before there were several incidences in that area so that?s why I wanted to reiterate do you want another cruiser over there.? 10) 23 Dispatcher Delvecchio was asked what he would normally do after receiving the radio information from Officer LoBianco. He said, so We taken down the plate number I?ve taken down the Sierra number that he gave me, I found out that he doesn?t need another cruiser, I?ve opened up the call I put in the suspicious activity I've written that 913 has reported that he?s off in this area. This is what?s going on and then I?m going to enter the call then I'm going to go in and enter the plate and the Sierra number. Get the information attached to the call and then close it out.? 12) Dispatcher Delvecchio was asked if he recalled what happened next concerning this incident. He said, ?So as I am putting in the information, I believe l?m still putting in the information is when Chief Olsson called he called I believe just the main number." (p.13) Dispatcher Delvecchio was then played a recording of a telephone call with him from Chief Glenn Olsson on June 5, 1838 hours to the SSRECC. Dispatcher Delvecchio stated that in the call he was reading information off the computer screen and simultaneously providing it to Chief Olsson. Dispatcher Delvecchio stated to Chief Olsson ?i haven?t logged it in yet but I got all the information on the call. Do you want me to just delete everything out of it? Chief Olsson responded by saying just don?t do anything till I get right back to you let me I don?t want to (inaudible) legitimate 18) Dispatcher Delvecchio was asked what he meant in that part of the conversation about deleting information. He said, ?This point so it?s two different screens when you?re getting the information it?s on one screen so I?ve got all the (personal) information on the screen, the call is on the screen so it takes one click to put the information from the screen onto the screen which attaches it to the call.? 19) He further said haven?t attached anything and the way he?s talking assume I?m saying, guess you don?t want this attached for some reason?.? 19) Dispatcher Delvecchio was asked if the call number was already on the screen and in. He said ?the call number is in and it?s probably just got this attached (the narrative) because it would be all this stuff that hadn't been attached, the vehicle information, operator information, you know the VIN, the make, the model, the address.? 20) Dispatcher Delvecchio was asked what he believes happened next. He said, ?Before we close it the call has been generated, it's now in the stack, with something like this it would, you know, where an officer is just trying to make something logged, we would havejust logged it, got the information. Back?lled everything and then just closed it.? 22) 24 Dispatcher Delvecchio said that he does not believe he closed the call. He said ?I?m certain that there was a conversation because again I did not know who this Powers person was, you know, not being from this town. I didn?t know who any of these people were, my supervisor was a Hingham person, a Hingham resident who may have known you know what the chief was even talking about. I was very confused as to why there was sort of any issue.? 25) Dispatcher Delvecchio stated he remembers at some point Chief Olsson coming into the SSRECC and speaking with him and his supervisor. He was asked what he recalled the conversation was about between him, the Chief, and his supervisor. He stated, ?He wanted to know what the logs The log said ?913 reports he was being followed by a party with a Black Lives Matter sign? and may even have said being harassed by a party with a Black Lives Matter sign.? 26) Dispatcher Delvecchio was asked if those were his words (harassed in the narrative). He said ?that was my words but I verbatim can?t give you exactly what it said was but it was something to the effect of 913 is being bothered by somebody with a Black Lives Matter sign.? He further stated "the Chief looked at the narrative and said that he did not want Black Lives Matter as part of the narrative. That was all I remember him saying to me that?s the only thing.? 26) Dispatcher Delvecchio was asked about the word harassed and whether he put that word in the original narrative. He said, ?i believe I might have but I can?t be certain.? 27) Dispatcher Delvecchio then said at the Chief?s request he changed the sign to the narrative to say "913 reports he was being followed by a party waving a sign.? 27) He said he then told the Chief this is what the log now says and he said that the Chief said ?that?s fine?. 27) Dispatcher Delvecchio said that he believes their interaction with the Chief was approximately 5 to 10 minutes long. He was asked if he ever told the Chief he was not going to do that and he said "no did I say I wasn?t it had been something that thought was going to be like absolutely terrible I would?ve said ?you know my supervisor will do that? but to me in that moment I didn?t see an issue with it.? 28) Dispatcher Delvecchio said his supervisor was there with him during this conversation with the Chief but he could not remember what the supervisor said. Dispatcher Delvecchio was asked if Chief Olsson told him to take out any other information. He said, "No, not to my recollection because if he did it wouldn?t have been in there.? 28) 25 Dispatcher Delvecchio stated, ?100% I can tell you the Black Lives Matter was in the narrative.? 29) Dispatcher Delvecchio said that he took that out. Dispatcher Delvecchio was asked if he did the modification at 1903 hours as it indicates on the log document. He said, "It must have been. I'm just going by what the log says it was." 29) Dispatcher Delvecchio said he did not modify the call more than once. Dispatcher Delvecchio was shown the log with the changes in the narrative at 1903 and he said that?s when he believes he made the change to the narrative. Dispatcher Delvecchio said he did not hear anything else about this incident that night. He said he also did not have any further conversations with anyone else about this incident. He was asked if his supervisor, Gordon, had any problem with the way things were rectified and he said ?Not that I know of no, he didn?t say anything to me." 31) Dispatcher Delvecchio was asked if he felt any pressure by anyone to make these changes. He said ?None whatsoever.? 31) Dispatcher Delvecchio stated he has not spoken to anyone in the public or provided any information to the public concerning this incident 20-28394. Jonathan Gordon, Administrative Supervisor September 30. 2020 On September 30, 2020 at approximately 1:55 PM, investigators from Matthews Matthews, LLC conducted an interview of Mr. Jonathan Gordon, Administrative Supervisor for the South Shore Regional Emergency Communication Center (SSRECC). The interview took place at the Hingham, MA Town Hall in the East hearing room. The purpose of the interview was to determine what information Mr. Gordon had concerning Hingham Police Department incident number 20- 28394 that occurred on Friday, June 5, 2020 at approximately 6:30 PM. This interview was recorded with the permission of Mr. Gordon. Mr. Gordon has been an employee of SSRECC since its inception in 2012. The SSRECC is located on the second floor of the Hingham Police Department. Mr. Gordon said that the SSRECC is the regional emergency communications center for four towns on the South Shore. He identified them as Hingham, Hull, Norvvell and Cohasset. Mr. Gordon stated that prior to working at the SSRECC, he was employed by the Town of Hingham as a dispatcher for the Hingham Police and Fire Departments beginning in 1995. 26 Mr. Gordon said that he currently works an administrative schedule Monday through Friday. He said he works the day shift Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday and on Thursday and Friday he works a 4 PM to 12 AM shift. Mr. Gordon said that he typically is responsible for supervising 4 to 5 dispatchers during his shift. Mr. Gordon said that he was working as an administrative supervisor on June 5, 2020 and was familiar with the incident (20-28394) that was called into the SSRECC by a Hingham Police officer operating cruiser 913 at approximately 6:30 PM. Investigators then played a copy of the tape-recorded radio communication from Cruiser 913 on June 5, 2020 that was provided by the Town of Hingham for Mr. Gordon. Mr. Gordon identified the police officer making the transmission as one of the LoBianco brothers whom he stated are both current Hingham Police officers. Mr. Gordon identified the dispatcher that is communicating with the cruiser 913 Dispatcher Joseph Delvecchio. Mr. Gordon stated that he did not hear the original radio transmission when it occurred. He stated at some point shortly after the original transmission, he was made aware of the person that was involved in the incident with Of?cer LoBianco. He further stated believe it was one of the current selectpersons_.? 9) He could not however recall who informed him that it was a selectman's-. Mr. Gordon was asked what in his opinion was Officer LoBianco asking the SSRECC Dispatcher Delvecchio to do concerning this incident. He said, ?He?s asking for a simple log entry to make the Hingham Police Department aware that the incident occurred, and it's just a log note and the CAD (Computer Aided Dispatch) entry is then put in. It?s stamped with the officer?s request and the notes that he said during the radio transmission and then put in the call.? (pp. 10-11) Mr. Gordon stated that the CAD numbers are assigned in sequential order and they are generated by the dispatcher on the computer screen. He said, ?With our system it?s designed live so it?s designed to be entered as the call happens versus writing it down completely and then putting it in. We put the call in as the call is happening live.? 10) Mr. Gordon said "Once I found out who the party was that was involved, I made a phone call to the of?cer in charge down at the Hingham desk.? 9) Mr. Gordon was then provided with an audio of the recorded call that was made June 5, 2020 at 6:42 PM from the SSRECC that is labeled Zetron H. Mr. Gordon identified that that label indicates his desk phone and he stated that all the lines in the SSRECC are recorded. 27 Mr. Gordon identified himself as the caller that was recorded on the line and he stated ?l?m speaking to Lieutenant Sean Cavanaugh, the shift OIC for the Hingham Police Department that day.? 13) Mr. Gordon stated that he called Lieutenant Cavanaugh at his desk downstairs in the Hingham Police Department. He stated that when he refers to the 901 in the telephone call that ?901 is the designation for the Hingham Police Chief.? 13) During the conversation with Lieutenant Cavanaugh, Mr. Gordon said, ?So we have a call on the system that we?re not gonna do anything with it just wanted you to know it was there. And I guess he may want to delete it so I just I don?t know what?s going on he just talked to one of the dispatchers told him the same thing he probably just told you, a little less.? 14) Mr. Gordon was asked whom he was referring to when he said he talked to one of the dispatchers he said "the Chief". 15) Mr. Gordon was asked if he knew how Chief Olsson spoke to the dispatcher. He said, ?Now hearing that, I?m not sure whether he called up and spoke to the dispatcher or if he had come into the dispatch center and actually when he spoke to if he hadn?t spoken to one of the dispatchers after that.? 15) Mr. Gordon was asked if he recalled Chief Olsson coming in to the SSRECC. He said, "He did come in and speak with me briefly yes." He further stated, don't remember the exact timeline, if I spoke to the lieutenant first or if the Chief came in before I spoke to Lieutenant, I don?t remember that.? 16) Mr. Gordon was asked what Chief Olsson requested or talked about with him. He said believe when we spoke, i asked him ?what do you want to do with this?? And I believe he said ?we are going going to do anything right now or we?re gonna hold off.? don?t remember exact wordage but I think definitely did not say we were gonna delete the item. I believe we were just gonna put it on pause and we were just going to hold off for now.? 16) Mr. Gordon was asked then why in the telephone conversation with Lieutenant Cavanaugh he mentioned the word delete. He stated ?The word delete was a term that I used it was not something that someone told me we were going to do and that was de?nitely a word that I used. I brought that into the conversation. I was not told to bring that into the conversation.? 17) Mr. Gordon was asked if the CAD number was already generated for this call when the Chief came in to see him. He said ?Yes the new CAD entry was made instantly when that officer called in that radio transmission.? (p.17) 28 Mr. Gordon was asked what if anything could be changed on this call. He said ?i think the only thing that could have been really changed was if we had made some updates to the CAD notes that would actually say who is involved and I don?t believe we did that at all, I don?t know." 17) Mr. Gordon said that he recalled having a brief conversation on June 5, 2020 in person with the Chief at the SSRECC. He was asked why he believed he and the Chief were having a conversation concerning this incident and he said, "We?re having this conversation because it potentially involved a public official and was not aware of the town?s protocol for the level of involvement of a town official or a potentially a town of?cial. And I wasn?t sure how they wanted it worded, by no means were we ever going to say that that incident did not happen. We would never delete anyone that was in the CAD entry. ljust want to know how we wanted to word it. Because I know our log entries hit the press. And I?m not sure of the town policy.? 18) Mr. Gordon was asked if it was his concern or the Chiefs concern when the Chief came in to speak with him. He said, "My concern of how the log was. I wanted to make sure it was the way that the town would like it.? 19) Mr. Gordon stated he could not recall the timeline of when he spoke to Chief Olsson. Mr. Gordon said he did not recall if he called Chief Olsson or if the Chiefjust heard the radio transmission and came into the SSRECC. Mr. Gordon was asked if the Chief?s concern was how much information would go in about a town official in the log. He said, believe it was how the information was put in not that the information wasn?t to be put in it was just how we were going to word it and maybe making sure that the involved parties were put into the correct area of the CAD so that it wasn?t necessarily thrown out to the press with all the names involved.? 20) Mr. Gordon explained that there are a couple of sections to each CAD entry. He said there is a location of the incident, there?s the parties involved with the incident and then there?s the CAD notes on the incident. 20) Investigators then showed Mr. Gordon a copy of the administrative log for call number 20-28394 that was provided to investigators by the Town of Hingham as the log information that is not released to the public. Mr. Gordon reviewed the document and stated that the number 20- 28394 is the CAD number assigned for the incident. Mr. Gordon said that the name at the bottom of the document next to the narrative is Joseph Delvecchio. Mr. Gordon stated that Joseph Delvecchio was the assigned dispatcher that day for the Hingham and Norvvell Police Departments. 29 Mr. Gordon was asked about the narrative that indicates modified by Joseph Delvecchio on 06/05/2020 at 1903. Mr. Gordon said, ?Modified by I?m not sure usually if the notes were modified would have to look at a different log entry, to be totally sure with that but that may mean that the notes were modified by him and that does happen from time to time whether or not it?s words and how the word was spelled wrong and he went in incorrectly spelled something whether he phrased it differently and wanted to rephrase it so that it sounded good. We know that this is posted online and to the press. So, we try to make sure that the spelling is correct the you know the narrative flow the way they?re supposed to.? 23) Mr. Gordon was asked who has the ability to change a log entry. He said the dispatcher can make the change and he believes a supervisor could make a change. He further said, ?but that would be time stamped and their name would be there as well?. 23) Mr. Gordon stated that if someone went in and just read the log, there would not be a time stamp on who or when it was read only. Mr. Gordon was also shown a document that was provided to investigators by the Town of Hingham. He identified this as the more public log that contains less personal information and that is something that is generated by each town concerning their own town speci?c incidents. Mr. Gordon stated that he believes he was in the room when Dispatcher Delvecchio ?rst started to put information into the CAD system at 1838 hours. He further stated, "If he changed this do not know if he added, deleted anything. I can?t tell on this. I don?t know whether he ?xed spelling errors, if he added a couple of words or two or a couple of words or took out a couple of words. I cannot tell that.? 29) Mr. Gordon was asked if he had any follow up conversations with either Chief Olsson or Lieutenant Cavanaugh regarding the incident 20-28394 and how it was rectified. He said, "i consider myself; they have been noti?ed, they are going to take care of whatever they need to take care of. They are either gonna you know leave things the way they are or reword things whatever you know you have to do. It?s not something that occurs frequently at all, like I said my mindset on this particular call was and would do this for any public official, anybody of importance, I would want to make sure that the narrative is written the way it should be you know, not deleted but that it makes sense and the proper information is there. But I will in this narrative section is where I would make sure the names of parties that should be up in the section, the party section, are where they need to be. Because I know with the press log, you?ll see that none of this information the parties involved, are in that. It?s just narrative so I like to make sure that the parties involved are not in the narrative they're in where they're supposed to be.? 31) 30 Mr. Gordon stated that it?s his recollection that the Chief was not upset when he came into the SSRECC. He also said that Chief Olsson did not say ?we are deleting this, that was a word I brought to the table only.? 33) Mr. Gordon stated that it is his understanding that once a CAD number entry is registered the incident cannot be deleted. Mr. Gordon stated he did not hear anything more about this incident until sometime later on social media around the time there were issues with the blue lives matter flag in the Town of Hingham. Mr. Gordon stated that no one from the public has asked him for information concerning incident 20?28394. He also said he does not know of anyone that has provided information concerning incident number 20-28394 to a member of the public. Mr. Gordon further stated that neither Chief Olsson nor Lieutenant Cavanaugh or anyone else from the Hingham Police Department has asked him for information concerning this incident. Mr. Gordon stated that he never learned what information was changed concerning this incident number. He said that in looking at the document now after hearing what the officer called in it appears that the description of the sign being Black Lives Matter is not contained in the narrative. Investigators then played a tape-recorded conversation between Chief Glenn Olsson and Dispatcher Joseph Delvecchio that was recorded on June 5, 2020 at 1838 hours and provided by the Town of Hingham. Mr. Gordon stated that in reviewing the times and listening to the call it appears that Joseph Delvecchio entered the incident into the CAD system as soon as he received the radio transmission. Mr. Gordon stated in listening to that call he believes that Chief Olsson is ?doing two things, he wants to make sure that the person that he thinks it is it is. And he wants to make sure that it?s a legitimate call. At the end of the conversation he said he wants to make sure this is legitimate if it needs to be in there, it needs to be in there. The dispatcher said to him ?Do you want me to take the information out;? the log entry would stay in there but some of the information that was in it maybe could?ve been taken out.? (p.51) Mr. Gordon said that some of the involved parties? personal information could have been taken out if Chief Olsson said take it all out. He further said ?But he (Chief Olsson) didn?t. He said leave it in for now he wanted to make sure this was a legitimate callneeded to be in there, it needed to be in there.? 52) 31 Ms. Laurie Croke and Mr. Aaron Smith September 25, 2020 On September 25, 2020, at approximately 9:43 AM, investigators from Matthews Matthews, LLC conducted an interview of Ms. Laurie Croke at the Hingham Town Hall conference room. Ms. Croke is the Executive Director of the South Shore Regional Emergency Communications Center. Accompanying Ms. Croke was Mr. Aaron Smith, who is the Assistant Executive Director, South Shore Regional Emergency Communications Center. This interview was conducted in furtherance of the Town of Hingham investigation regarding an incident 20-28394 at the Derby Street Shopping Plaza in Hingham, MA on June 5, 2020. The interview of Ms. Croke and Mr. Smith was audio recorded with their permission. Ms. Croke stated that she has been employed by the South Shore Regional Emergency Communications Center (SSRECC) since its inception in 2012. She stated that she was hired as a Floor Supervisor, overseeing the work of the dispatchers. She was elevated to the position of Executive Director and oversees the twenty-four employees at the center. Ms. Croke said that the SSRECC is located in the Hingham Town Hall, 210 Central St. Hingham, MA. Mr. Smith stated that he also began working for the SS RECC in 2012. Ms. Croke explained that both she and Mr. Smith are not direct employees of the Town of Hingham, but rather employed by a joint compact of the towns of Hingham, Hull, Cohasset, and Norwell, MA. Ms. Croke added that the dispatch center oversees all calls for service involving police, fire, and EMS requests and coordinates all direct communication with first responders in the field. Ms. Croke stated that outside of the radio communication system, there are five recorded telephone lines into the center for emergency calls for service from the public, and each of the four participating towns have two lines located at their police or ?re station for direct access to the dispatch center. Ms. Croke was advised that the incident under investigation occurred on June 5, 2020 at the Derby Street Shops. She stated that she was aware of the incident under review and had taken the opportunity to review some records and listen to some calls prior to the interview. Matthews Matthews? investigators showed Ms. Croke a document entitled the Hingham Police Dispatch Log which is dated June 5, 2020. Ms. Croke stated that the record on the log re?ects that the incident number was 20- 28394. She added that this is a Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) number that was generated by the dispatch system. Ms. Croke stated the record presented to her reflects Dispatcher Joseph Delvecchio?s name and the time of the creation was 1838 hours. 32 Ms. Croke explained that once a dispatcher creates a narrative for a particular call and hits to save the entry, the system captures the date and time of entry. Ms. Croke stated that the particular Hingham Police log entry in question was "modified" by Dispatcher Delvecchio at 1903 hours. Ms. Croke stated that the IMC system captures the last modification to each entry with an updated date and time. Ms. Croke was asked if she is aware of what modi?cations Dispatcher Delvecchio made to the log entry at 1903 hours on June 5, 2020. She stated, do not know what was changed.? 14) Mr. Smith was similarly asked if he was aware what Dispatcher Delvecchio changed in the log?s narrative. He replied, do not know what was changed.? Ms. Croke clarified the point by explaining that any re-opening of a log entry, regardless if for a spelling check or to add or delete content would result in a modi?cation of the log?s date and time. She added, "When I read the logs, ifl go into a call -- like, this morning, if I went into a call to see what it said or to look at who, you know, who was involved, it says that I modified it I didn?t. ljust went in and read it." 15) Ms. Croke stated the system can handle several calls at the same time and generate individual numbers. She said that some calls may be very requiring multiple page entries by the dispatchers. investigators played several calls for Ms. Croke and Mr. Smith regarding the incident on June 5, 2020. The first audio recording was identi?ed as the original radio call from the of?cer on scene at the Derby Street Plaza. In this call, the officer contacts SSRECC Dispatcher Delvecchio stating, ?Just make a log entry (inaudible) -, suspicious activity (inaudible) operator is potentially? .. Vehicle?s following me around with a Black Lives Matter sign. Seems to have joined up with another group of vehicles. Nothing?s showing at this time. Just make a log entry.? 20) Ms. Croke stated that she heard a second audio call in which she identi?ed the person calling into the SSRECC as Hingham Chief of Police Glenn Olsson. She said this second call was answered by Dispatcher Allison Graham and that the call was transferred over to Dispatcher Delvecchio. The audio recording reveals that Chief Olsson asks, ?Who is dealing with that call that called about Mary Powers?" The dispatcher advises the Chief that it was Dispatcher Delvecchio and the Chief requests to speak with Dispatcher Delvecchio. Once on the line, Chief Olsson states, ?Can you give me the name of Mary Power?there, the address and everything, (inaudible) it could be the selectman.? 23) On the recording, Chief Olsson states, ?We may not want the info in there if it?s the selectman.? 24) Dispatcher Delvecchio advises Chief Olsson about the vehicle that was queried and that it was listed to a with an address on -. Chief Olsson con?rms that the name and address are_ the selectman. 33 Dispatcher Delvecchio also confirms the vehicle involved and provides the Massachusetts registration of to Chief Olsson. Chief Olsson states, "Yeah, can you not put that in therewho?s the cruiser?" Dispatcher Delvecchio responds, ?uh, it's 1-3 and he?s not actually on my board. it's, uh, LoBianco.? Chief Olsson states, ?Yeah, okay.? Dispatcher Delvecchio asks the Chief, "So, do you want me -- ?cause I?ve already I haven?t logged it yet but I?ve got all the information in the call. Do you want me to just delete everything out of it?? Chief Olsson replies, ?Just don't do anything till I get right back to you, If it's something legitimate." 25) Ms. Croke was asked about the policy and procedures that are followed by the dispatchers at the SSRECC. She stated the policies were developed jointly by all four towns involved and every call or transmission is standardized for each department. Ms. Croke explained that certain information is required to go into the log for each call, but the discretion as to content and specifics remains with the dispatcher. Ms. Croke advised that the officers on the street also have the ability to run motor vehicle registrations and license data on the mobile data terminal within the cruiser. She added that many officers request the dispatchers to make these queries so the officer on scene can deal with other things. Ms. Croke and Mr. Smith both agreed that in this particular matter, it appears that Dispatcher Delvecchio ran the motor vehicle registration for Of?ce LoBianco and populated the info into the MC CAD system. Ms. Croke was asked if there is a policy that governs what a dispatcher can take out of a narrative once a call log has been made. She stated, don?t think that there?s anything in writing. Um, if -- if any time an officer, a chief, somebody calls up to talk to a dispatcher to say, you know, something?s not right here, that sh? should really -- mean, Joe really should have given that call to the supervisor.? 37) Ms. Croke added that when it comes to removing a call entirely from the system, she does not believe that the dispatchers or the supervisors have the ability in the system to do so. She also explained that certain members of each police department have administrative rights to review call content, listen to audio recordings and review report data. Ms. Croke stated that when Dispatcher Delvecchio entered the license plate on the vehicle involved at the Derby Street incident, he also entered a brief narrative as directed by Of?cer LoBianco. Ms. Croke was asked, ?In your opinion, if Delvecchio neglected the Black Lives Matter portion of the sign, if he had modified that by taking out or was instructed by Gordon or somebody else -- to take that out, would that be appropriate?? Ms. Croke replied, ?Um, I -- that -- that -- that?s a tough call. I mean, if a Chief calls up 34 and asks you to do something, typically you do it unless it?s something that is so egregious that, you know, somebody?s going to get hurt, um, and they?re telling you to do something to break the law, that type of thing. Joe should?ve passed that off to the supervisor.? 51) Ms. Croke added, ?I?m sure he talked to the supervisor after he got the call from -- he hung up -- because that?s why the supervisor called (inaudible) to the lieutenant.? 51) Investigators played an additional audio recording for both Ms. Croke and Mr. Smith. This recording involves Dispatch Supervisor John Gordon calling Lt. Cavanaugh at the Hingham Police station to discuss Chief Olsson?s call to the SSRECC. Dispatch Supervisor Gordon states, "So, we have a call in the system for that. We?re not going to do anything with it. ljust wanted you to know it was there and guess he may want to delete it. Um, so, ljust -- I don't know what?s going on. He just talked to one of the dispatchers and told him -- was the same info he just told you or a little Lt. Cavanaugh responded, ?He certainly can (inaudible) do that. I am not telling you to do that at all. That?s - it?s not my thing. (laughs). Dispatch Supervisor Gordon adds, "80, ljust wanted you to be aware that the call is in this system and that we?re not acting on it - so you?re not, like, how come we?re not dealing with this?? Lt. Cavanaugh says, "yeah, okay.? (pp. 53-54) Ms. Croke stated that she understood the context of the telephone call between Lieutenant Cavanaugh and Dispatch Supervisor Gordon. She said the issue was that the original call would remain open in the CAD system and would remain that way until it was closed out. She stated that the particular issue with the original call was the fact that Office LoBianco was not working a regular shift and assigned to a patrol area at the time. This caused a different formatting issue when it came to closing out the call. She added that this often happens when an officer is working a paid detail and gets involved in an incident. Investigators requested that Ms. Croke provide a copy of the current for the dispatchers and supervisors if one is available. In closing, Ms. Croke was asked if a dispatcher or supervisor made the decision to change the narrative and content of a call, thereby creating a modi?cation record, would that be a violation of anything? Ms. Croke replied, ?no, not if it was coming from somebody with higher authority, no.? 62) She added that if they made the decision on their own, then there would be an issue. 35 Ms. Mary Power, Chairman, Hinqham Board of Selectmen September 30, 2020 On September 30, 2020 at approximately 12:09 PM investigators from Matthews Matthews, LLC conducted an interview of Mary Power, Chairperson of the Board of Selectmen in the Town of Hingham, MA. Ms. Power was told the purpose of the interview was related to an investigation of police incident number 20-28394 and any involvement or knowledge she had concerning this incident. The interview was recorded with the permission of Ms. Power and she was accompanied by Attorney Kate Cook. Ms. Power stated she is a member of the Town of Hingham Board of Selectmen and she is currently the Chairperson. Ms. Power stated she did not hear the call involving the Town of Hingham Police incident number 20-28384. Investigators told Ms. Power the incident on June 5, 2020 involved a police officer making a report regarding a vehicle which was registered to her and the incident was at the Derby Street Shops. When asked, Ms. Power stated she first heard about this incident on Sunday evening, July 26, 2020. Ms. Power stated that in the preceding week the Town of Hingham had issued an order to have a flag removed from a fire truck which created a lot of commotion in the town. She stated she had spoken to Town Administrator Tom Mayo about the possibility of them attending roll calls to assure the Police Department of their support. Ms. Power stated on Sunday evening July 26, 2020 she received a call from a former member of the Board of Selectmen, Paul Healey. Ms. Power stated Mr. Healey called her to say that he heard she and Mr. Mayo might be going to roll calls. She stated Mr. Healey also told her he had heard some rumors in the past and wanted to give her a ?heads up,? 4) if something came up during one of the roll call visits. She stated Mr. Healey told her there had been chatter around the Department about something at the Derby Street Shops, and it involved_ and Police Chief Glenn Olsson. When asked if she had a conversation about the incident with Chief Olsson in June 2020 Ms. Power stated and she was not aware of the call then. 4) Ms. Power stated her first conversation after learning this from Mr. Healey on July 26, 2020 was with She stated she told- what Mr. Healey had said and- - replied that he thought he knew what Mr. Healey might be talking about. Ms. Power stated said that he was at the Derby Street Shops waiting for- orders which was his job at the time. Ms. Power stated - told her he was parked in the parking lot which was nearly empty because that was a time when everything was closed. She stated - told her a police vehicle parked about thirty feet away from his vehicle and the officer began observing him with binoculars. Ms. Power stated - I told her he had a ?black lives matter? sign in the vehicle and he displayed it in the windshield and then received a call for an order so he removed the sign and went to pick up the order. Ms. Power stated the next morning (July 27, 2020) she called Chief Olsson and told him about the information she received from Mr. Healey and that she had spoken to -. She stated she asked Chief Olsson if he could provide information to her because 36 according to - he never spoke with or had any interaction with the police officer. Ms. Power stated she told Chief Olsson she was interested in knowing what happened but also told him if he was uncomfortable talking about this she would understand. Ms. Power stated Chief Olsson told her that on June 5, 2020 there was concern by the Police Department that there could be potential violence at shopping centers based on events that had occurred in neighboring communities. She stated Chief Olsson told her that a police officer at the Derby Street Shops was there to ?keep an on things.? 7) Ms. Power stated Chief Olsson told her he was sitting at his desk and he could hear the report from the police officer over the scanner and he heard her name and name. She stated Chief Olsson told her picked up the phone to call somebody, to say, ?This isn?t what you think it is.? And he told me that he had a phone conversation and that, subsequent to that, he -- and I?m not sure if it was the same call or a different call he asked for the name of the dispatch operator who received the call and told me that he walked over to the dispatch center to speak with that person.? 8) Ms. Power stated the Chief said he did not want people to react to something other than what the situation was. Ms. Power stated at the beginning of the conversation Chief Olsson told her he did not say anything to her about the incident because he thought if it was something wanted to tell her he would have. She stated her interaction with the Chief basically ended with her thanking him for the information. Ms. Power stated later in the day on July 27, 2020 after speaking with Chief Olsson, the Board of Selectman were copied on a public records request that went to the Police Department and the request referenced a log number. Ms. Power stated she believes on the morning of July 28, 2020 she called Chief Olsson and asked him if the reference number was related to the incident at the Derby Street Shops involving - and he said ?yes.? (p.10) Ms. Power stated she had copies of all the emails sent to the Board of Selectmen. Ms. Power acknowledged the emails were from to the Town of Hingham. She stated the ?rst email she received from referencing the June 5, 2020 incident was received on July 27, 2020 regarding Hingham Police incident number ?20- 28394.? (p.13) Ms. Power stated ?This was the first I was seeing that it was June 5th. But as I looked at the items in this records request, it corresponded to Chief Olsson?s description to me of the events that took place within the Police Department that evening. Ms. Power produced a copy of the public information request to the Hingham Police Department received on July 27, 2020. When asked, Ms. Power stated at no time did she ask Chief Olsson or anyone in the town to intercede to make the call involving - go away and essentially have it removed from the record. When asked, Ms. Power stated she never asked anyone to omit anything from the incident log concerning this matter. 37 Ms. Power stated Chief Olsson had essentially told her it was a nonevent and not anything that rose to the level where it required any engagement by the police or a police report. Ms. Power stated she believes on the morning of Wednesday July 29, 2020 she received a call from Chief Olsson who told her he had a copy Derby Street and he provided her with a copy of the printout. (p.17) Ms. Power produced a copy for Investigators to review and Investigators identi?ed it as a document reflecting it was from the South Shore Regional Emergency Communications Center printed 7/27/2020, for date 6/5/2020, Friday with a call number of 20-28394 and a time of 18:38. The document included a caption of "Suspicious activity,? with the name of Joseph Delvecchio and a narrative and also indicated it was modified at the bottom. Ms. Power stated Chief Olsson gave her this document, but she did not remember looking at it carefully. (p.18) When asked, Ms. Power stated she observed the document noted it was modified at 19:03 but she has no idea what was modified in the document. When asked, Ms. Power stated she observed that the listed officer was Chris LoBianco. She stated she was on the Board of Selectmen panel that interviewed and hired Of?cer LoBianco. When asked, Ms. Power stated she never had a conversation with Of?cer LoBianco regarding this incident involving When asked, Ms. Power stated she never asked Chief Olsson or Officer LoBianco either directly or indirectly to modify or change anything that happened within the log document regarding this incident, nor is she aware of anyone making such a request. 20) Ms. Power stated found it a little bit odd that_, on the 27th, had knowledge that this was modi?ed. Because if you go to the website in the Hingham Police Department and you look at the log, you see this reference number and you see this description but nothing else. Uh, my greatest concern at that point was, looking at this document and looking at all of the personal information it contained and looking at the speci?city of - records request -- my concern was -- was whether was whether, uh, this document - wh- whether this information had gotten any inappropriate visibility or had been shared in any way, in a manner that is inconsistent with the operating procedures of the Hingham Police Department. That was my concern, as a Police Commissioner and as a citizen of the Town of Hingham.? 22) When asked, Ms. Power stated all Board of Selectmen members are Police Commissioners. When asked, Ms. Power stated she did not know anyone who disseminated public information without authorization. When asked, Ms. Power stated Chief Olsson also provided her with another record of an incident on July 27, 2020 involving suspicious activity at the Derby Street Shops which was an unrelated incident. Investigators identified this record as incident number 20-28421, at 20:34 on June 5, 2020 and it was printed on July 27, 2020. This record involved Officer LoBianco reporting a party was trying to find a place to take a nap and it was cleared. 26) Ms. Power also produced some handwritten notes Chief Olsson provided to her. When asked, Ms. Power stated 38 she guesses Chief Olsson provided this other incident on June 5, 2020 to show there was other activity down there and it was not just focused on her vehicle. 28) When asked, Ms. Power stated she never threatened Chief Olsson or anyone else concerning their employment over what happened to -. When asked, Ms. Power stated she never had a conversation with any other members of the Board of Selectmen to impact anyone's employment over this issue. She noted Mr. Mayo had informed her they would have to recuse her on dealing with the records request since she was personally involved with the incident. Ms. Power was asked if it was her understanding she could be provided with the log entry she received from Chief Olsson and she replied, ?When I called the chief on Tuesday the i said, you know, see this records request.? And I said, ?Am I entitled you know, ?am I entitled to see this stuff?? And, uh, I will tell you, you know, This is my sixth year as a member 0' the Board 0? Selectmen. Uh, in the ?ve preceding years, I served on the Advisory Committee, three of which in a leadership role. When I have engaged with department heads, Chief Olsson or any department head, in asking for information or asking, it is my practice to precede that with, ?If in any way this is an inappropriate ask of me, - welcome you to tell me that and you know, ?and I accept that.? And, I think my reputation on that matter speaks for itself. And i? if Chief Olsson had said, it?s not -- I can?t give this to you,? i wouldn?t pushed it. That?s not who I am.? (p.32) When asked, Ms. Power stated she did not do anything to impact Chief Olsson?s decision to retire and she was not part of any discussions between Chief Olsson and Town Of?cials concerning his retirement. She stated on Wednesday, July 29, 2020, Mr. Mayo informed her there was a conversation taking place with the ?town? and Chief Olsson, but she was not provided any further details. Ms. Power stated on August 2, 2020 at 9:45 PM she received a call from Mr. Mayo who told her Chief Olsson would be submitting his retirement letter the following day on August, 3, 2020 and it would take effect on this day. She stated she had no involvement in any of the decision making leading to Chief Olsson?s retirement. 37) Ms. Power stated ?i want to say for the record that, in my conversations with Chief Olsson on the 27th and the 28th and the 29th, never once did I bring up nor did he bring up any questions with respect to his employment, his tenure, his retirement within the Town of Hingham." 38) Ms. Power stated Chief Olsson told her he made the call to dispatch with the intent of ensuring the incident was described for what it was. She stated Chief Olsson told her when he heard the call over the scanner, he made a phone call to someone and she believes it was a member of the Hingham Police Department, but he never said who it was. Ms. Power stated after showing - what was written he told her he was not following anybody, and his vehicle was stationary. Ms. Power stated that there have been subsequent allegations made by_ that- had been verbally 39 harassing police officers and yelling Obscenities and getting in the way of doing their job. (pp. 39-40) Ms. Power produced a document and stated in his letter to, uh, Attorney General Maura Healey, says, Well, I?ll I?ll show you. You can read- - concerns. And he is al-? he is alleging in that and it?s it?s different -- that he says extremely reliable source in the town -- police super?." 42) Investigators reviewed the document and stated for the record that the document was by a citizen to the Attorney General, which read: "As told to me by an extremely reliable source in the town government, Power contacted Olsson regarding the inci-- Olsson spoke with a police supersis-- uh, supervisor about the incident on a recorded line and ordered that no report be written.? 42) Ms. Power stated she is not aware of any member of the Hingham Police Department that made any allegations regarding this incident. September 30, 2020 On September 30, 2020 at approximately 1:15 PM, investigators from Matthews Matthews, LLC conducted an interview of_, who is currently a . was told the purpose of the interview was related to an investigation of police incident number 20-28394 and any involvement or knowledge he had concerning this incident. The interview was recorded with the permission of. - and he was accompanied by Attorney -. stated he was at the Derby Street Shops in Hingham, MA operating a vehicle on June 5, 2020 at approximately 6:30 PM. He stated he was driving a 2005 black Chevrolet Tahoe and at the time he was working as a part-time employee for a food delivery service by the name of - which is the equivalent of- or stated the vehicle he was operating is registered to Mary Power. - stated, ?What I was essentially doing was waiting for the -- the app to send me a new order so I pulled into a parking space basically to -- just to wait around till it happened.? 2) He stated Friday and Saturday are always busy with people in the area ordering food from some of the restaurants at the Derby Street Shops. - stated approximately fifteen to twenty minutes after his arrival at the Derby Street Shops, he received an order to pick up food at the Chipotle restaurant which is located at the Derby Street Shops. stated he drove into the shopping parking lot and went by the Panera restaurant and then drove and parked in front of the REI store. stated the parking lot was ?pretty empty.? stated approximately five to ten minutes after he parked, a Hingham Police cruiser which was a Ford Explorer, or Interceptor drove by and parked about thirty feet away from him. stated ?not really? when asked if he drove around for a while before he parked his vehicle. stated ?i could at least see through his like windshield. His driver?s side window. So, I could actually see a visual of the officer himself.? (p.10) 40 was asked to explain what happened next and he replied mean after he pulled in I kind ofjust kept sitting there. I was just on my phone minding my own business. Uh, like five or so minutes later I looked up and I noticed that he was like just staring at me with a pair of binoculars.? further stated thought it was just kind of strange and didn?t think much of it but he continued to do it for a few more minutes. Uh, and eventually I?m -- I?m sure this has been mentionedvehicle. Went around to the trunk. Like of- car. I didn?t walk around or anything like that. Uh, pulled out a black lives matter sign and then put it in the windshield so he basically couldn?t see into. car. I just thought it was kind of strange that was getting observed that closely I guess." (p.12) When asked, stated ?There was no point where we got close enough to have any verbal interaction and that didn?t occur in any manner.? stated two or three minutes after he put the sign in his windshield, he could see through a crack that the officer was still staring at him so he jokingly or in a friendly manner waved at the officer and the officer waved back in a friendly manner. when he received the call to pick up the food at the Chipotle restaurant the cruiser did not move. When asked, stated the sign in his windshield was four or five feet wide and a foot and a half tall. He stated the writing on the sign was ?computer black ink? and read ?black lives matter? and there was also a logo of a hand or fist on the sign. I - stated he put this sign in. window to prevent the officer from staring at him. He stated he had the sign in. vehicle because the next day he was going to a protest in Hingham regarding the black lives matter movement. stated he did not talk to anyone about this incident until approximately one month later when told him there were rumors about the event within the police department. He stated he later learned someone had submitted a freedom of information request for the logbook and some of the other documentation about this incident. stated - provided him with a document about the incident and he learned the officer?s name is LoBianco. stated he knows the logbook indicated he was following an officer waving a sign. He stated people have been saying that he was shouting Obscenities which did not happen. When asked, stated he does not believe he was driving behind the officer. stated when he received the food order, he drove approximately a quarter mile in the same plaza, and he did not notice the officer doing anything else. was asked if he was aware that the record of this incident was changed. - - stated- initially told him about this and she showed him the report. He stated said there may have been something in the report that was modified. stated there was a narrative with a name and underneath it showed it was modi?ed by someone else and there are two different time stamps. Investigators showed_ a copy of the log entry regarding this incident and upon review- 41 stated ?Yeah, that looks correct. With the -- the narrative at 18:38 and then modified on 19:03." 23) stated on the date of this incident he did not meet with any other vehicles or persons. He stated when picking up food at the Chipotle restaurant you are not allowed to go inside, and people have to wait in a line outside. He stated was standing in a line. I guess the only person I interacted with was the worker at Chipotle at a guess." 24) He stated this interaction with the Chipotle worker occurred outside while he was waiting in a line with other people. lnvestiqative Findinqs and Conclusions As a result of the administrative investigation conducted by Matthews Matthews, LLC concerning the actions of members of the Hingham Police Department and Town of Hingham of?cials regarding Incident 20-28394, the following investigative findings are submitted for your consideration: 0 Officer Christopher LoBianco was working a special detail assignment at the Derby Street Shops on June 5, 2020 from 4 PM to 12 midnight. . The mission of the Hingham Police for the Derby Street Shops special detail was to provide public safety with additional dedicated patrols to the shopping plaza and to note vehicles and activity that could potentially be involved in damage to the businesses and property at the Derby Street Shops. . The Hingham Police Department and Chief Olsson received intelligence information from other law enforcement agencies that people from a possible Antifa like group might be parking their vehicles in remote areas and remote shopping malls and protesting in the Boston area and then when returning to their vehicles possibly cause damage in the areas where they originally parked. . On June 5, 2020 at approximately 1837 hours, Of?cer Christopher LoBianco made note of a vehicle that was driving in the Derby Street Shops parking area. The vehicle was operated by and the vehicle was registered to -, Mary Power. . Mary Power is currently Chair of the Board of Selectmen in the Town of Hingham. At some point, the vehicle was operating was parked in the Derby Street Shops parking lot and facing the Hingham Police cruiser operated by Officer Christopher LoBianco. The- vehicle and Of?cer LoBianco?s cruiser were approximately 20-30 feet apart. 42 Officer Christopher LoBianco utilized a pair of binoculars to better observe the vehicle and the operator, and Officer Christopher LoBianco exchanged hand waves. placed a sign with the words "Black Lives Matter? and a picture of a fist and placed it against. windshield. Officer Christopher LoBianco did not stop the vehicle that_ was operating at any time on June 5, 2020. There was no verbal exchange between Of?cer Christopher LoBianco and - never spoke to each other verbally. The visual encounter between Officer LoBianco and lasted approximately 5 minutes. then left the area where he was parked and drove to the area within the Derby Street Shops where Chipotle is located. Officer LoBianco remained where he was parked and did not make any further observations of the vehicle operated by_ that evening. Of?cer LoBianco made a radio transmission of his observations of the- vehicle to the South Shore Regional Emergency Communications Center (SSRECC) on June 5, 2020 at 1837 hours. The SSRECC is located on the top ?oor of the Hingham Police Station. Dispatcher Joseph Delvecchio received the transmission from Of?cer LoBianco at 1837 hours. Dispatcher Delvecchio generated a Computer Aided Dispatch number (CAD #20-28394) at 1838 hours. Of?cer LoBianco asked that the information he provided be documented as a log entry for informational purposes only. Of?cer LoBianco did not write a police report of the observations he made on June 5, 2020 approximately 1837 hours at the Derby Street Shops. Dispatcher Delvecchio created handwritten notes as he received the information from Officer LoBianco in order to assist him in entering the information he received into the computer system. Dispatcher Delvecchio did not save the notes. 43 Dispatcher Delvecchio made an inquiry of the criminal justice information system CJIS to learn the information on the vehicle, owner and potential operator in order to document the information as it was provided by Officer LoBianco concerning call 20-28394. Dispatcher Delvecchio transferred the information that he received from CJIS and populated the information into the fields in the CAD system. Dispatcher Delvecchio also created a narrative in the CAD system for call 20- 28394 to describe the circumstances of the transmission he received from Officer LoBianco. Of?cer LoBianco did not use the word ?harassed? in his radio transmission or telephone conversation with Lieutenant Cavanaugh to describe the observations he made of? at the Derby Street Shops on June 5, 2020. In the original narrative that he entered for incident 20?28394 1838 hours, Dispatcher Delvecchio included the words Black Lives Matter to describe the sign, as was reported by Officer LoBianco in his radio transmission. The CAD system narratives entered into the system are the Dispatcher?s interpretation of events as relayed to them by the officers on the scene of an incident. Chief Glenn Olsson heard the radio transmission made by Cruiser 913 (Officer LoBianco) to the SSRECC on his Hingham Police radio at approximately 1837 hours. Chief Glenn Olsson called the SSRECC on a recorded line at 1838 hours from his desk at the Hingham Police Department and had a conversation with Dispatcher Delvecchio. Chief Olsson inquired about the identity of the parties involved regarding incident 20-28394. Chief Olsson learned in the conversation with Dispatcher Delvecchio that it was Of?cer LoBianco who made the transmission and that the vehicle was registered to Mary Power and the operator of the vehicle was potentially Chief Olsson told Dispatcher Delvecchio that he may not want the information regarding in the CAD system. Dispatcher Delvecchio asked Chief Olsson if he wanted him to delete anything out of the personal information concerning - and Incident 20?28394. 44 Chief Olsson told Dispatcher Delvecchio not to do anything with entering the incident information until he got back to him. Chief Olsson then called from his office phone to Lieutenant Sean Cavanaugh, the of?cer in charge of the shift, on a recorded line at the Lieutenant?s desk downstairs in the Hingham Police Department at 1840 hours. Chief Olsson asked Lieutenant Cavanaugh to call the Officer involved (LoBianco) to inquire about incident 20-28394. Chief Olsson believed that the Of?cer in Cruiser 913 had actually stopped the vehicle involved. On June 5, 2020 at 1842 hours, Supervisor Jonathan Gordon called the desk of Hingham Police Lieutenant Sean Cavanagh and had a conversation with Lieutenant Cavanaugh concerning incident 20-28394. Jonathan Gordon stated in his phone conversation with Lieutenant Cavanaugh at 1842 hours that they had an open call in the system and Chief Olsson may want it deleted. Jonathan Gordon stated in his interview with investigators that Chief Olsson never said to him that he wanted the call deleted. Supervisor Gordon stated that was a representation that he made in his conversation with Lieutenant Cavanaugh. Once a CAD number is assigned to an incident for a call that CAD number cannot be deleted but can be modified. The CAD numbers for incidents are assigned in sequential order. The assigned CAD call number log can be modified and the time and modi?cation are date and time stamped with the individual that modified the document. The document does not show the original wording in the document. The log document will reflect only the changes that were made once the document is modified. The CAD system does not allow for retrieval of the original wording in the document. On June 5, 2020 at approximately 1843 hours, Lieutenant Sean Cavanaugh called Officer LoBianco on his cell phone from a recorded line in the Hingham Police Department. Lieutenant Cavanaugh and Officer LoBianco discussed the observations and radio transmission regarding incident 20- 28394. Lieutenant Cavanaugh told Officer LoBianco that he had no trouble with leaving everything he observed in the log. 45 Chief Olsson went over to the SSRECC on June 5, 2020 at approximately 1845 hours. The SSRECC is located across from his office in the Hingham Police station. Chief Olsson had a conversation with Dispatcher Delvecchio and Dispatcher Supervisor Gordon. Chief Olsson inquired from Dispatcher Delvecchio what was written in the log concerning incident 20-28394. The original narrative for incident 20 -28394 contained the words Black Lives Matter sign. Chief Olsson told Dispatcher Delvecchio to change the original description of party waving a Black Lives Matter sign to party waving a sign. Chief Olsson believed that the use of the term Black Lives Matter in the brief narrative of a suspicious activity log report was not warranted because he did not want the public perception to be that the Hingham Police were pursuing people for having a Black Lives Matter Sign. The incident number 20-28394 was modified at 1903 hours to reflect the requested change by Chief Olsson to the call. Dispatcher Joseph Delvecchio is listed as the Dispatcher who modified the document. Central Square Technologies is the parent company that provides Computer Aided Dispatch capabilities and interoperability for the Hingham Police Department and the SSRECC. investigators learned from an inquiry made to Central Square Technologies that when a CAD incident report is modi?ed in a short time period as is the circumstance in this investigation (the modification was made within 25 minutes of the original text 1838-1903 hours), the original text wording is not recoverable. Chief Olsson did not ask Dispatcher Delvecchio or Supervisor John Gordon to remove the personal information concerning Mary Power being the registered owner of the vehicle or the personal information of? being the operator of the vehicle from the police incident log. The official Hingham Police log for incident 20-28394, which is described as suspicious activity, contains all of the personal information, including home addresses, for both Mary Power as the owner of the vehicle and as the operator. The log for incident 20- 28394 which is posted on the Hingham Police Department website, does not contain any of the personal information of the 46 parties involved in this incident, as is the practice for information released to the public. The internal nonpublic logs that are generated on the CAD system within the SSRECC are available to be read and reviewed by members of the Hingham Police and Fire Departments, dispatchers and civilian records clerks. The public log for this incident contains the following information: incident number 20-28394, it is labeled as suspicious activity, the time of incident as 1838 hours, Location Derby Street Shoppes and a Narrative that 913 was being followed by a party waving a sign. A review of Chief Olsson?s office phone records on June 5, 2020 from 1830 2200 hours are consistent with the calls provided in this investigation by the town. A review of Chief Olsson's cell phone on June 5,2020 from 1830-2200 hours is also consistent with the information that was learned in this investigation. There were no text messages that were recovered from Chief Olsson?s cell phone. Selectman Mary Power did not learn of the incident involving her vehicle and. that occurred on June 5,2020 until late in July 2020. did not tell_ about anything that occurred on June 5, 2020 at the Derby Street Shops until late in July when she asked him about it. Selectman Mary Power did not have any conversation with Chief Olsson concerning the incident involving or incident 20-28394 until sometime around July 27, 2020. Selectman Mary Power learned that the town had received a public records request for documents concerning incident number 20- 28394 from a citizen of Hingham, Massachusetts on July 27, 2020. Selectman Mary Power met with Chief Olsson on or about July 29, 2020 to discuss the circumstances surrounding and her vehicle that were observed by Officer LoBianco on June 5, 2020 and the public records request for information concerning incident 20-28384. Chief Olsson supplied Selectman Power with copies of the logs regarding incident 20- 28394 as well as notes that he had produced regarding his understanding and involvement with the incident. 47 Selectman Mary Power did not ask Chief Olsson or anyone from the police department or the SSRECC to directly or indirectly change any of the circumstances, log entries, documents or description of events concerning incident number 20-28394 that involved her vehicle or_ on June 5, 2020 at approximately 1837 hours. Selectman Mary Power did not threaten or in?uence Chief Olsson to make any decisions regarding the changes that were made to the original incident 20- 28394. Selectman Mary Power did not discuss or disseminate any information regarding incident #20-28394 to any unauthorized persons. Selectman Mary Power did not have any involvement in Chief Olsson's decision to retire and she was not part of any discussions between Chief Olsson and town of?cials concerning his retirement. Chief Olsson made the decision to change the wording in the original incident number of his own accord and without any undue influence by anyone inside or outside of Hingham town government. Chief Olsson had the authority to ask Dispatcher Delvecchio to edit some of the wording in the narrative of 20-28394. It is the conclusion of investigators from Matthews Matthews, LLC, based upon a preponderance of the evidence standard in this investigation, that the actions of members of the Hingham Police Department and Hingham Town Of?cials regarding incident #20-28394 were within the limits of their authority. To date, investigators have found no evidence that any members of the Hingham Police Department or Hingham Town Officials released any confidential records or documents concerning Incident 20- 28394 to any persons not authorized to receive them. Further, it is the opinion of Matthews Matthews that the actions of Hingham Police and Town Officials concerning this incident would not warrant referral to another authority. However, we recognize that decision would be made by the Town Administrator upon a review of our investigative ?ndings. 48 Hingham Police Department Page: 10 Dispatch Log From: 06/05/2020 Thru: 06/05/2020 0000 - 2359 Printed: 06/08/2020 20-28386 1758 Phone - WELL BEING CHECK Services Rendered Location/Address: Narrative: CALLER REQ CHECK ON HER DAUGHTER AND GRANDDAUGHTER. HAS NOT HEARD FROM THEM IN A COUPLE OF DAYS. CALLER IS FROM SOUTH BOSTON. SAYS THE GRANDDAUGHTER WAS SICK, HAS ASTHMA. AS FAR AS THE CALLER KNOWS. NO FLU LIKE DOES NOT BELIEVE SHE WOULD BE IN ANY KIND OF DANGER. FEMALE DOES NOT KNOW THE ADDRESS. IN HOUSE THE DAUGHTER COMES BACK TO THIS ADDRESS. Narrative: 917 RPTS UNITS CLEAR. STATES THE DAUGHTER WILL CALL STATION WHEN MOTHER RETURNS. ONGOING ISSUES WITH THE GRANDMOTHER 20-28390 1815 Initiated - STOP 5 Citation Issued Location/Address: 17 WARD ST 300 HIGH ST Narrative: CITATION 20-28391 1826 911 - 911 CALI. Referred to Other Agency Location/Address: (BIN 011326] SOUTH SHORE REGIONAL EMERGENCY - 210 CENTRAL ST Narrative: 911 TRANSFER TO wsynogrn. 20-28393 1834 Initiated - STOP Citation Issued Location/Address: 26 OLD COUNTY RD Narrative: 20-28394 1338 Radio - SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY Log Entry Only Location/Address: 011137) DERBY STREET SHOPPES PROPERTY MGR - 100 DERBY ST Narrative: 913 RPTS WAS BEING FOLLOWED BY A PARTY NAVING A SIGN 20-28395 1843 Initiated - STOP Citation Issued Location/Address: HINGHAM LIGHT DEPARTMENT - OLD GARAGE - 308 CUSHING ST Narrative: CITATION ISSUED TO THE MALE OWNER. 20-28396 1851 911 - FIRE ALARM RESIDENTIAL Services Rendered Location/Address: 42 SMITH RD Narrative: CALLER RPTS HER FIRE ALARMS WERE SOUNDING, WENT OFF 20 MINS AGO AND JUST STARTED AGAIN. JUST SHUT OFF. NEG COVID SCREENING. ADVISED T0 EVACUATE. Narrative: BAD BATTERY IN THE DETECTOR, CLEAR. 20-28398 1904 Phone - ERRATIC OPERATION Arrest(s) Made Location/Address: 06807] NINETY NINE RESTAURANT PUB - 428 LINCOLN ST Narrative: FROM WEYMOUTH AN ERRATIC MOPED JUST COMING IN FROM BRIDGE ST THEIR TOWN Narrative: PASSING STARS. Narrative: TURNED HEADING BACK TOWARDS SHIPYARD chd?xauau Page: 1 South Shore Regional Emergency Communications Center Call Number Printed: 07/29/2020 Call Number Time Call Reason Action Priority Duplicate 20-28394 1838 Radio SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY Log Entry Only 1 Call Taker: DELVECCHIO, JOSEPH Location/Address: 011137] DERBY STREET SHOPPES PROPERTY MGR 100 DERBY ST Jurisdiction: Fire District: EMS Service Area: Party Entered By: Involved Party: Vehicle Entered By: Vehicle: Operator: Owner: Inaurance Co: Policy No: Narrative: Modified By: HINGHAM Hingham District 3 Hingham District 3 06/05/2020 1903 DELVECCHIO, JOSEPH - HINGHAM, MA 02043?3954 DOB: Race: Sex: 06/05 2020 1839 DELVECCHIO, JOSEPH BLK 2005 CHEV UT Reg: PAN MA - VIN: POWER, MARY 0 HINGHAM, MA 02043?3954 SSN: Race: Sex: OLN: MA POWER, MARY 0 - HINGHAM, MA 02043-3954 SSN: Race: Sex: OLN: 06/05/2020 1838 DELVECCHIO, JOSEPH 06/05/2020 1903 DELVECCHIO, JOSEPH 913 RPTS WAS BEING FOLLOWED BY A PARTY HAVING A SIGN verizon? Invoice Number Account Number Date Due Page 9856105092 "Past Due 133 of268 Detail for Glenn Olsson: 781?635- Voice. continued Date Time Rumba! Rate UsageType Driginalion Destinaiun Min. Total F. .17. a I. .221 EL6ng 11:55? Paar. PIanAIlca'.? Canazset MA East-Put Plzn?itnw Canassei M: interning EL ?i -- ME 73' Fez-i. Earrazse! into min; CL 3 3m Thursday, October ?15, 2020 1:25:59 PM - Window Olsson, Glenn (x2201) User Activity Detail Report Start Date: 6/5/2020 End Date: 6/5/2020 Start Time: End Time: Show Internal Calls: True WAN-VPN- User Activity Date Time InIOut WG Secured, Time Stamp Action Dialed Calling Trunk Duration 06/05/2020 Out-Int Yes No-No?No? Originate 1487 2201 0:00: 18 06/05/2020 Out-Ext No No-No-No Originate 1483 2201 Town (23) 0:02:07 06/05/2020 Out-Int No No-No-No Originate 2225 2201 0:01 :32 Total 3 Call(s) 0:03:57 Total 0:01:19 Average Grand Total 3Ca l(s) 0:03:57 Tota?i 0:01:19 Average Mitel Networks Corp. . Page 1 of1 OIC 5 (x2225) User Activity Detail Report Start Date: 6/5/2020 Start Time: End Date: 6/5/2020 End Time: Show Internal Calls: True WAN-VPN- User Activity Date Time lnIOut WG Secured Time Stamp Action Dialed Calling Trunk Duration 06/05/2020 ln-Ext No No-No-No PickUp 1781804i +1781383- Town (02) 0:00:01 06/05/2020 ln-Ext No No-No-No PickUp 1781804- +1781383- Town (02) 0:01:07 06l05/2020 Out-Ext No No-No-No Originate +1781383- 2225 Town (23) 0:00:21 06l05/2020 ln-Ext Yes No-No-No WGAgent 781-804- +1781740- Town (01) 0:01:37 06/05/2020 ln-lnt No No-No-No Called 2225 2201 0:01:32 06l05/2020 ln-Ext Yes No-No-No Transfer 781-804- +1781740? Town (01) 0:00:58 06/05/2020 Out-Ext No No-No-No Originate 7961 2225 Town (23) 0:01:28 06l05/2020 In-Ext Yes No-No-No WGAgent 781-804- +1781706_ Town (01) 0:01:56 06l05/2020 ln-Ext Yes No-No-No WGAgent 781-804- +1781740- Town (01) 0:00:42 06l05/2020 ln-Ext No No-No-No Called 1781804. +1617592- Town (01) 0:02:36 06/05/2020 ln-Ext Yes No-No-No WGAgent 781-804- +1781706- Town (01) 0:01:23 06l05/2020 ln-Ext No No-No-No Called 1781804- +1617592- Town (01) 0:01:13 06/05/2020 Out-Ext No No-No-No Originate 7952 2225 Town (23) 0:00:34 06l05/2020 ln-Ext No No-No-No Called 1781804? Blocked Town (01) 0:00:18 06l05/2020 ln-Ext No No-No-No Called 1781804- +1781760- Town (01) 0:03:40 Total 15 Call(s) 0:19:26 Total 0:01:17 Average Grand Total 150a l(s) 0:19:26 Total 0:01:17 Average Mitel Networks Corp. Page 1 of 1 m??cvu?? - 13%sz (?31th elonS?IEr Parks 103 and D160.- gem-.- a) -J .m?erI- I: 0940.ch ha :05 0514.3 I .- aha-?01. Mia Jake. . .-.. SJJW Am,m.4_ 450114100. WK calL?EmeCmE} W6 was?Conc?moo/ QCvm-n?. ?afz?c. The?? wooVJ Wi?vmj?- 01' 44mg. game . Mami?cgas_ Maw Pmugis- 0.0L. 3.00.00050? 0 Iva-Me 000.40: ., 0r01c?e 04?, who we. wNe, baton? . - LI) 1: can'Izzcjui --.. .. M54 mac, Mrd? I0 (eackx Owce Loan?a . of o~l\ dob-1? - . - 5) Ca\\ (euxcwed ?We MICK \03 Msf?k?e usmIeI?xw and astd INA +0 Naif 5mm? .. wsam?mwx?0 mahobIe c0036 for We jigg?' ?We M00 arom?L U\o\m??ov\ or (Tm/?05, Occor(4?c/